Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488757›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2024

Pharmacist-led telehealth deprescribing for people living with dementia and polypharmacy in primary care: A pilot study.

Ariel R Green, Rosalphie Quiles, Andrea E Daddato, Jessica Merrey, Linda Weffald, Kathy Gleason, Qian-Li Xue, Meghan Swarthout, Scott Feeser, Cynthia M Boyd and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Associations Between ACO Enrollment Status and Drug and Nondrug Costs Among Older Adults Newly Diagnosed With ADRD.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ariel R GreenDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4127-4617
Rosalphie QuilesDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Andrea E DaddatoKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jessica MerreyJohns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Linda WeffaldKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kathy GleasonKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Qian-Li XueDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Meghan SwarthoutJohns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Scott FeeserJohns Hopkins Community Physicians, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Cynthia M BoydDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer L WolffDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Marcela D BlinkaDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Anne M LibbyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Rebecca S BoxerDavis Department of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, California, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JASON H KARLAWISH · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JUAN TRONCOSO · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
U.S. Deprescribing Research NetworkR24AG064025 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA, STEINMAN, MICHAEL A. · 2019 to 2023
$9.9M
eAlign: A Patient Portal-based Intervention to Align Medications with What Matters MostR01AG077011 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ariel Green, CHRISTINE D JONES · 2022 to 2026
$3.9M
Patient-Centered Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Research and Mentoring ProgramK24AG056578 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056578NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077011NIA NIH HHS R01AG077011NIA NIH HHS R24 AG064025NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546NIH HHS K24AG056578NIH HHS R24AG064025NIH HHS U54AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with dementia (PLWD) have complex medication regimens, exposing them to increased risk of harm. Pragmatic deprescribing strategies that align with patient-care partner goals are needed.

methodsA pilot study of a pharmacist-led intervention to optimize medications with patient-care partner priorities, ran May 2021-2022 at two health systems. PLWD with ≥7 medications in primary care and a care partner were enrolled. After an introductory mailing, dyads were randomized to a pharmacist telehealth intervention immediately (intervention) or delayed by 3 months (control). Feasibility outcomes were enrollment, intervention completion, pharmacist time, and primary care provider (PCP) acceptance of recommendations. To refine pragmatic data collection protocols, we assessed the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI; primary efficacy outcome) and the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassles Scale (FCMAHS).

results69 dyads enrolled; 27 of 34 (79%) randomized to intervention and 28 of 35 (80%) randomized to control completed the intervention. Most visits (93%) took more than 20 min and required multiple follow-up interactions (62%). PCPs responded to 82% of the pharmacists' first messages and agreed with 98% of recommendations. At 3 months, 22 (81%) patients in the intervention and 14 (50%) in the control had ≥1 medication discontinued; 21 (78%) and 12 (43%), respectively, had ≥1 new medication added. The mean number of medications decreased by 0.6 (3.4) in the intervention and 0.2 (1.7) in the control, reflecting a non-clinically meaningful 1.0 (±12.4) point reduction in the MRCI among intervention patients and a 1.2 (±12.9) point increase among control. FCMAHS scores decreased by 3.3 (±18.8) points in the intervention and 2.5 (±14.4) points in the control.

conclusionThough complex, pharmacist-led telehealth deprescribing is feasible and may reduce medication burden in PLWD. To align with patient-care partner goals, pharmacists recommended deprescribing and prescribing. If scalable, such interventions may optimize goal-concordant care for PLWD.

Indexed as

DementiaDeprescriptionsPharmacistsPolypharmacyPrimary Health CareTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot Projectsdementiadeprescribingprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38488757
PMCPMC11226386
OpenAlexW4392884939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.