ReviewCancer research2024
NCI Cancer Research Data Commons: Resources to Share Key Cancer Data.
Review in Cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Managing, Analyzing and Sharing Research Data with Gen3 Data Commons.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Global impact of germline structural variation on the cancer proteome.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Where is the data? Delayed and chronic irAE surveillance and management after cessation of ICIs: expert insights from SITC on survivorship care and the need for long-term data.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Building Pediatric Cancer Cohorts and Accessing Data Using Childhood Cancer Data Initiative Tools.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Analysis of clinical, single cell, and spatial data from the Human Tumor Atlas Network (HTAN) with massively distributed cloud-based queries.Research square · 2025Article
- Oncopacket: integration of cancer research data using GA4GH phenopackets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Cancer incidence data at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area level in the United States interpolated by Monte Carlo simulation with multiple constraints.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Sharing data from the Human Tumor Atlas Network through standards, infrastructure and community engagement.Nature methods · 2025Review
- Validating the predictions of mathematical models describing tumor growth and treatment response.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Robust Cluster Prediction Across Data Types Validates Association of Sex and Therapy Response in GBM.Cancers · 2025Article
- Building Portable and Reproducible Cancer Informatics Workflows for Scalable Data Analysis: An RNA Sequencing Tutorial.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Usage of the National Cancer Institute Cancer Research Data Commons by Researchers: A Scoping Review of the Literature.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Defining precancer: a grand challenge for the cancer community.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- NCI's Proteomic Data Commons: A Cloud-Based Proteomics Repository Empowering Comprehensive Cancer Analysis through Cross-Referencing with Genomic and Imaging Data.Cancer research communications · 2024Article
- NCI Cancer Research Data Commons: Lessons Learned and Future State.Cancer research · 2024Review
- NCI Cancer Research Data Commons: Core Standards and Services.Cancer research · 2024Article
- NCI Cancer Research Data Commons: Cloud-Based Analytic Resources.Cancer research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Since 2014, the NCI has launched a series of data commons as part of the Cancer Research Data Commons (CRDC) ecosystem housing genomic, proteomic, imaging, and clinical data to support cancer research and promote data sharing of NCI-funded studies. This review describes each data commons (Genomic Data Commons, Proteomic Data Commons, Integrated Canine Data Commons, Cancer Data Service, Imaging Data Commons, and Clinical and Translational Data Commons), including their unique and shared features, accomplishments, and challenges. Also discussed is how the CRDC data commons implement Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles and promote data sharing in support of the new NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy. See related articles by Brady et al., p. 1384, Pot et al., p. 1396, and Kim et al., p. 1404.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.