Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488466›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2024

Bias correction models for electronic health records data in the presence of non-random sampling.

Jiyu Kim, Rebecca Anthopolos, Judy Zhong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiyu KimDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-0928-2841
Rebecca AnthopolosDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7251-7792
Judy ZhongDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-8447
New York University · US

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
EHR-based vs population-based CVD risk predictions for older patients with diabetesR01AG065330 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ZHONG, HUA JUDY · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
CVD Risk and Outcome Heterogeneity in Older Adults with DiabetesR01AG054467 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ZHONG, HUA JUDY · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
Personalized Risk Predictions with Deep Learning Methods in the Presence of Missing and Biased Electronic Health Record DataR01LM013344 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SMYTH, PADHRAIC, ZHONG, HUA JUDY · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054467NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065330NIH HHS R01LM013344NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) contain rich clinical information for millions of patients and are increasingly used for public health research. However, non-random inclusion of subjects in EHRs can result in selection bias, with factors such as demographics, socioeconomic status, healthcare referral patterns, and underlying health status playing a role. While this issue has been well documented, little work has been done to develop or apply bias-correction methods, often due to the fact that most of these factors are unavailable in EHRs. To address this gap, we propose a series of Heckman type bias correction methods by incorporating social determinants of health selection covariates to model the EHR non-random sampling probability. Through simulations under various settings, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method in correcting biases in both the association coefficient and the outcome mean. Our method augments the utility of EHRs for public health inferences, as we show by estimating the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and its correlation with risk factors in the New York City network of EHRs.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth StatusBiasHumansRisk FactorsSelection Biasbias correctionEHRsSNARsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID38488466
PMCPMC10941326
OpenAlexW4392870883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.