ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Consistency of spatial ability performance in children, adolescents, and young adults.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a spatial skills test for 4th grade primary school students: validity and reliability study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The relationship between spatial ability self-efficacy and visualization performance: psychometric evidence.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Smart exercise in pediatric oncology: enhancing executive functions through cognitively challenging physical activity- a non-randomized controlled trial.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Functional Vision Skills in Children with Cerebral Visual Impairment.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- A 6-week coordinative motor training program improves spatial ability performances in healthy children.Frontiers in cognition · 2024Article
- A single session of coordinative motor training does not improve spatial ability performances in healthy children.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Transcranial direct current stimulation and online cognitive training to enhance cognitive function and emotional stability in borderline personality disorder: an open-labelled pilot study.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPNArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spatial abilities are essential cognitive skills for many aspects of our everyday life that develop substantially throughout childhood and adolescence. While there are numerous measurement tools to evaluate these abilities, many of them have been designed for specific age groups hampering comparability throughout development. Thus, we determined test-retest-reliability and minimal detectable change for a set of tests that evaluate spatial ability performance in their variety in youth and compared them to young adults. Methods: Children (age: 11.4 ± 0.5 years, Results: Irrespective of test, reliability was "excellent" (i.e., ICC Conclusion: The determined values indicate that the investigated set of tests is reliable to detect spatial ability performance in healthy children, adolescents, and young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.