ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic evaluation of robot-assisted, conventional laparoscopic, and open myomectomy: a 10-year single-center retrospective study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical efficiency for gynecological surgery with a single robotic console: the value of the surgical team and robotic technology in maximizing efficiency on intensive surgical days: a comprehensive analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Tubal Coagulation, Z-suturing of External Cervical Os, and Vaginal Washing May Prevent Cancer-cell Spillage during Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Feasibility and Safety of ArtiSential for Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Gynecologic Cancer: Results from the KGOG 4002/GYANT Study.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes between the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and da Vinci® Xi in Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- From Incision to Precision: The Rise of Focused Ultrasound Surgery in Minimally Invasive Gynecology.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Treatment Options for Uterine Fibroids Using Microwave and Radiofrequency.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed through conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) versus robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Materials and Methods: Perioperative data, including operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications, were retrospectively analyzed in 731 patients with gynecologic malignancies who underwent transperitoneal PLND, including 460 and 271 in the CLS and RAS groups, respectively. Data were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test or Student's Results: The mean age was 50 ± 14 years and 53 ± 13 years in the RAS and CLS groups ( Conclusion: Shorter operative time and lower blood loss are achieved when PLND for gynecologic malignancies is performed through CLS rather than RAS. However, RAS results in the resection of a greater number of pelvic lymph nodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.