Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487610›Full record

ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

Uterine Manipulation May Not Influence Ongoing Pregnancy: Case Report and Literature Review.

Kaijing Wan, Mohamed Siraj Shahul Hameed, Ann Wright, Bernard Su Min Chern

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaijing WanDepartment of General Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, K. K. Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Mohamed Siraj Shahul HameedDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, K. K. Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Ann WrightDepartment of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, K. K. Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Bernard Su Min ChernDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, K. K. Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
KK Women's and Children's Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal pain is a very common presentation in early pregnancy. Its cause may be gynecological or totally nonpregnancy related. While acute appendicitis is the most common nonobstetric cause of pain in pregnant women, diagnosis and differentiation from other causes, including ectopic pregnancy, remain challenging. In clinical situations of uncertainty, laparoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool, but uterine manipulation should be avoided if an intrauterine pregnancy is a possibility. In this report, we describe a case of complicated appendicitis in very early pregnancy where the patient ended with a full-term healthy pregnancy despite undergoing a diagnostic laparoscopy with inadvertent uterine manipulation.

Indexed as

Abdominal pain in early pregnancyappendicitislaparoscopylive birthuterine manipulation

Identifiers

PMID38487610
PMCPMC10936724
OpenAlexW4389676151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.