Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487525›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

Peritumoral brain zone in glioblastoma: biological, clinical and mechanical features.

Alberto Ballestín, Daniele Armocida, Valentino Ribecco, Giorgio Seano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alberto Ballestín *Tumor Microenvironment Laboratory, UMR3347 CNRS/U1021 INSERM, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
Daniele Armocida *Human Neurosciences Department, Neurosurgery Division, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Valentino Ribecco *Tumor Microenvironment Laboratory, UMR3347 CNRS/U1021 INSERM, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
Giorgio Seano *Tumor Microenvironment Laboratory, UMR3347 CNRS/U1021 INSERM, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive and invasive tumor that affects the central nervous system (CNS). With a five-year survival rate of only 6.9% and a median survival time of eight months, it has the lowest survival rate among CNS tumors. Its treatment consists of surgical resection, subsequent fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. Despite the implementation of clinical interventions, recurrence is a common occurrence, with over 80% of cases arising at the edge of the resection cavity a few months after treatment. The high recurrence rate and location of glioblastoma indicate the need for a better understanding of the peritumor brain zone (PBZ). In this review, we first describe the main radiological, cellular, molecular and biomechanical tissue features of PBZ; and subsequently, we discuss its current clinical management, potential local therapeutic approaches and future prospects.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBrainHumansTemozolomideTemozolomidebrain tumorcell plasticity and cell reprogrammingglioblastomalocal therapyperitumoral brain zonerecurrencesurgical resectiontumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38487525
PMCPMC10937439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.