Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487498›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2024

Variable selection for individualised treatment rules with discrete outcomes.

Zeyu Bian, Erica E M Moodie, Susan M Shortreed, Sylvie D Lambert, Sahir Bhatnagar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zeyu BianDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9849-9601
Erica E M MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7225-3977
Susan M ShortreedKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sylvie D LambertIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sahir BhatnagarDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada.

Funding

Improved tailoring of depression care using customized clinical decision supportR01MH114873 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MOODIE, ERICA, SHORTREED, SUSAN M · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An individualised treatment rule (ITR) is a decision rule that aims to improve individuals' health outcomes by recommending treatments according to subject-specific information. In observational studies, collected data may contain many variables that are irrelevant to treatment decisions. Including all variables in an ITR could yield low efficiency and a complicated treatment rule that is difficult to implement. Thus, selecting variables to improve the treatment rule is crucial. We propose a doubly robust variable selection method for ITRs, and show that it compares favourably with competing approaches. We illustrate the proposed method on data from an adaptive, web-based stress management tool.

Indexed as

double robustnesspenalisationprecision medicinevariable selectionweighted generalised linear model

Identifiers

PMID38487498
PMCPMC10930223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.