Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487443›Full record

ArticleAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2023

Improving hen welfare on cage-free egg farms in Asia: Egg producers' perspectives.

Kate Hartcher, Jayasimha Nuggehalli, Qing Yang, Maria Catalina T de Luna, Ali Agus, Shuichi Ito, Zulkifli Idrus, Iman H S Rahayu, Jutamart Jattuchai, Kris Descovich and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kate HartcherSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-7922
Jayasimha NuggehalliGlobal Food Partners, Singapore.
Qing YangGlobal Food Partners, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8394-0644
Maria Catalina T de LunaUniversity of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8530-4593
Ali AgusGadjah Mada University, Indonesia.
Shuichi ItoTokai University, Japan.
Zulkifli IdrusInstitute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
Iman H S RahayuBogor Agricultural University, Indonesia.
Jutamart JattuchaiBogor Agricultural University, Indonesia.
Kris DescovichSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5149-001X
Elissa LaneSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Michelle SinclairSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a trend towards the adoption of cage-free housing systems in the egg industry across Asia. While cage-free housing systems can hold significant animal welfare advantages over cages, there can also be challenges in managing these systems. This exploratory study aimed to investigate the perspectives of egg producers on the main challenges and proposed solutions associated with cage-free systems in China, Indonesia, Thailand, Japan, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Cage-free producers found disease prevention and maintaining a healthy profit margin more difficult than producers from cage farms, while it was less difficult to provide environmental enrichment in cage-free systems compared to cage farms. The top challenges for cage-free producers were the cost of production, system management, disease, sales, and egg production, and the top proposed solution was to improve on-farm practices and efficiencies. Eighty-one percent of egg producers believed that more support is needed to maintain their farms than is currently available, and support was most needed in helping to improve sales, improve farm operations, lower farm costs, and provide information for producers in the form of education and training. Most responses identified the government as the stakeholder that should offer support. These results may help direct further studies in this field as well as supplying information to develop relevant initiatives with an emphasis on education and training, thereby improving animal welfare on cage-free farms and increasing the uptake of high welfare cage-free farms across the region.

Indexed as

animal welfarecage-freeegg producersegg productionlayer henspoultry

Identifiers

PMID38487443
PMCPMC10936346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.