Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487442›Full record

ArticleAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2023

Digital Livestock Technologies as boundary objects: Investigating impacts on farm management and animal welfare.

Juliette Schillings, Richard Bennett, Françoise Wemelsfelder, David C Rose

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juliette SchillingsSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-6553
Richard BennettSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3226-8370
Françoise WemelsfelderAnimal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4178-4863
David C RoseSchool of Water, Energy, and the Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5249-9021
University of Reading · GBCranfield University · GBScotland's Rural College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital Livestock Technologies (DLTs) can assist farmer decision-making and promise benefits to animal health and welfare. However, the extent to which they can help improve animal welfare is unclear. This study explores how DLTs may impact farm management and animal welfare by promoting learning, using the concept of boundary objects. Boundary objects may be interpreted differently by different social worlds but are robust enough to share a common identity across them. They facilitate communication around a common issue, allowing stakeholders to collaborate and co-learn. The type of learning generated may impact management and welfare differently. For example, it may help improve existing strategies (single-loop learning), or initiate reflection on how these strategies were framed initially (double-loop learning). This study focuses on two case studies, during which two DLTs were developed and tested on farms. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders involved in the case studies (n = 31), and the results of a separate survey were used to complement our findings. Findings support the important potential of DLTs to help enhance animal welfare, although the impacts vary between technologies. In both case studies, DLTs facilitated discussions between stakeholders, and whilst both promoted improved management strategies, one also promoted deeper reflection on the importance of animal emotional well-being and on providing opportunities for positive animal welfare. If DLTs are to make significant improvements to animal welfare, greater priority should be given to DLTs that promote a greater understanding of the dimensions of animal welfare and a reframing of values and beliefs with respect to the importance of animals' well-being.

Indexed as

animal welfareboundary objectsDigital Livestock Technologieslearningpositive animal welfareprecision livestock farming

Identifiers

PMID38487442
PMCPMC10936290
OpenAlexW4321236074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.