Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487436›Full record

ArticleAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2023

Challenges in farmed insect welfare: Beyond the question of sentience.

Meghan Barrett, Bob Fischer

Open access · diamondAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Grinding as a slaughter method for farmed black soldier fly (Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Aquatic and Terrestrial Invertebrate Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. A new era forAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meghan BarrettDepartment of Biology, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA 90747, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-4983
Bob FischerDepartment of Philosophy, Texas State University, 601 University Dr, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.
California State University, Dominguez Hills · USTexas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global Insects as Food and Feed (IAFF) industry currently farms over a trillion individual insects a year and is growing rapidly. Intensive animal production systems are known to cause a range of negative affective states in livestock; given the potential scale of the IAFF industry, it is urgent to consider the welfare of the industry's insect livestock. The majority of the literature on farmed insect welfare has focused on: (i) establishing that insect welfare ought to be of concern; or (ii) extending vertebrate welfare frameworks to insects. However, there are many overlooked challenges to studying insect welfare and applying that knowledge in IAFF industry contexts. Here, we briefly review five of these challenges. We end with practical recommendations for the future study of insect welfare.

Indexed as

animal welfareblack soldier fliescricketsfarmed insectsinsect sentiencemealworms

Identifiers

PMID38487436
PMCPMC10936363
OpenAlexW4318067846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.