Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487434›Full record

ArticleAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2023

An effective environmental enrichment framework for the continual improvement of production animal welfare.

Peta S Taylor, Peggy Schrobback, Megan Verdon, Caroline Lee

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Physiological and Behavioral Responses of Stabled Horses (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peta S TaylorSchool of Envrionmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-5968
Peggy SchrobbackCSIRO, Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-1659
Megan VerdonTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Burnie, TAS, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-4161
Caroline LeeCSIRO, Agriculture & Food, Locked Bag 1, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1900-635X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substrates and objects are provided to farm animals on the assumption that they improve animal welfare by enriching the environment, but these often fail to consider the extent to which an environmental enrichment (EE) improves animal welfare, if at all. Furthermore, there are numerous definitions of EE, each with a unique expectation. If expectations of animal welfare improvement are set too high, industry uptake may be thwarted, but if thresholds are set too low it will not result in meaningful improvements to animal welfare. We propose an EE framework based on revised definitions of EE that reflect improvements to various components of animal welfare: (i) pseudo-enrichment; (ii) EE for meeting basic needs; (iii) EE for pleasure; and (iv) EE for positive welfare balance. This framework requires short- and long-term assessments to determine the impact of the EE, although many are lacking in the production animal literature. Redefining EE with a focus on specific animal welfare outcomes will assist producers in identifying the optimal EE for their enterprise. Subsequently, we encourage dialogue between farmers, researchers and industry stakeholders when designing environmental enrichment programmes. This framework is a science-based tool that can be used to inform the development of clear EE assessment protocols and requirements for animal welfare legislation, assurance programmes and industry. This evidence-based framework ensures that the focus is on the

Indexed as

animal welfareeconomicspleasurepositive affectpracticalityquality of life

Identifiers

PMID38487434
PMCPMC10936304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.