Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487421›Full record

ArticleAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2023

A One Welfare approach to identify socioeconomic vulnerability in families during investigations into companion animal abuse in Pinhais, Brazil.

Stefany Monsalve, Janaina Hammerschmidt, Micheli Ribeiro, Maria Vitoria Duarte Caleme, Solange Marconcin, Gizeli Filius, Rita de Cassia Maria Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. One welfare: bibliometric review of world literature.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefany MonsalvePrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Rua dos Funcionários 1540, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9085-0484
Janaina HammerschmidtDivisão de Bem-Estar Animal, Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente, Prefeitura de Pinhais, Rodovia Deputado João Leopoldo Jacomel 11427, Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil.
Micheli RibeiroSecretaria Municipal de Assistência Social, Prefeitura de Pinhais, Rodovia Deputado João Leopoldo Jacomel 12050, Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil.
Maria Vitoria Duarte CalemeSecretaria Municipal de Assistência Social, Prefeitura de Pinhais, Rodovia Deputado João Leopoldo Jacomel 12050, Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil.
Solange MarconcinDivisão de Bem-Estar Animal, Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente, Prefeitura de Pinhais, Rodovia Deputado João Leopoldo Jacomel 11427, Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil.
Gizeli FiliusSecretaria Municipal de Assistência Social, Prefeitura de Pinhais, Rodovia Deputado João Leopoldo Jacomel 12050, Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil.
Rita de Cassia Maria GarciaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Rua dos Funcionários 1540, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7333-013X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A One Welfare approach allows intervention to resolve problems related to the human-animal-environment interface. However, in Brazil and many other countries, there is poor communication between human and animal welfare services. In this research we considered a One Welfare approach in cases of abuse involving dogs and cats. When investigating pet abuse, professionals from the Animal Welfare Division of Pinhais, Brazil, can enter the home environment. During routine animal abuse investigations, the demographic profile of pet owners and their socioeconomic vulnerability was also recorded. Results from forty-five cases with (n = 30) and without (n = 15) suspicion of socioeconomic vulnerability were sent to the Department of Social Assistance of Pinhais, Brazil for confirmation. Socioeconomic vulnerability was suspected if socioeconomic problems were reported by the pet owners under investigation or their neighbours, as well by assessment of the socioeconomic environment of the families during home visits. Economic disadvantage was the most prevalent socioeconomic vulnerability. Cohen's Kappa coefficients support the ability of animal welfare service professionals to detect socioeconomic vulnerability. Almost half of all families considered to have socioeconomic vulnerability had not previously participated in social programmes. In all cases involving families already being assisted by the Department of Social Assistance, pets were found to be suffering abuse. Families with socioeconomic vulnerability confirmed were included in the social programmes. These results support the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to improve the well-being of families with dogs and cats. This study can help guide the development of an interdisciplinary approach to address animal abuse cases.

Indexed as

animal maltreatmentanimal welfarecatdoginterdisciplinary actionsOne Welfare

Identifiers

PMID38487421
PMCPMC10936322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.