ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023
Lung nodule false positive reduction using a central attention convolutional neural network on imbalanced data.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computer-aided detection systems for lung nodules play an important role in the early diagnosis and treatment process. False positive reduction is a significant component in pulmonary nodule detection. To address the visual similarities between nodules and false positives in CT images and the problem of two-class imbalanced learning, we propose a central attention convolutional neural network on imbalanced data (CACNNID) to distinguish nodules from a large number of false positive candidates. To solve the imbalanced data problem, we consider density distribution, data augmentation, noise reduction, and balanced sampling for making the network well-learned. During the network training, we design the model to pay high attention to the central information and minimize the influence of irrelevant edge information for extracting the discriminant features. The proposed model has been evaluated on the public dataset LUNA16 and achieved a mean sensitivity of 92.64%, specificity of 98.71%, accuracy of 98.69%, and AUC of 95.67%. The experimental results indicate that our model can achieve satisfactory performance in false positive reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.