Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487328›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024

MicroRNA as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in brain gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fatemeh Hasani, Mahdi Masrour, Kimia Jazi, Payam Ahmadi, Saba Sadat Hosseini, Victor M Lu, Amirmohammad Alborzi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Long noncoding RNAs in ubiquitination, protein degradation, and human diseases.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2024
    Review
  15. MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Brain Tumor.Cancer management and research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Fatemeh Hasani *Neuroscience Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Mahdi Masrour *School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kimia JaziClinical Research and Development Center, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Payam AhmadiFaculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Saba Sadat HosseiniNeuroscience Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Victor M LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Amirmohammad AlborziNeuroscience Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Golestan University · IRGolestan University of Medical Sciences · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Qom · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Brain neoplasms and central nervous system (CNS) disorders, particularly gliomas, have shown a notable increase in incidence over the last three decades, posing significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as promising biomarkers due to their regulatory role in gene expression, offering potential enhancements in glioma diagnosis and prognosis. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, included 25 studies for diagnostic accuracy and 99 for prognostic analysis, published until August 27th, 2023. Studies were identified through comprehensive searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed original research providing sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for miRNAs in glioma diagnosis, as well as survival outcomes with hazard ratios (HRs) or mean survival. Results and discussion: Meta-analysis demonstrated miRNAs' high diagnostic accuracy, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.781-0.855) and specificity of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.792-0.865), yielding an AUC of 0.893. Subgroup analysis by specimen type revealed consistent accuracy across blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and tissue samples. Our results also showed miRNAs can be potential prognostic biomarkers. miRNAs showed significant associations with overall survival (OS) (pooled HR: 2.0221; 95% CI: 1.8497-2.2105), progression-free survival (PFS) (pooled HR: 2.4248; 95% CI: 1.8888-3.1128), and disease-free survival (DFS) (pooled HR: 1.8973; 95% CI: 1.1637-3.0933) in tissue specimens. These findings underscore miRNAs' potential as valuable biomarkers for improving glioma diagnosis and prognosis, offering insights for enhancing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

brain neoplasmsdiagnosisgliomaMicroRNAsprognosis

Identifiers

PMID38487328
PMCPMC10937740
OpenAlexW4392289685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.