Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487295›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2024

Transgressive segregation, hopeful monsters, and phenotypic selection drove rapid genetic gains and breakthroughs in predictive breeding for quantitative resistance to

Steven J Knapp, Glenn S Cole, Dominique D A Pincot, Christine Jade Dilla-Ermita, Marta Bjornson, Randi A Famula, Thomas R Gordon, Julia M Harshman, Peter M Henry, Mitchell J Feldmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Why usefulness is rarely useful.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven J KnappDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Glenn S ColeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Dominique D A PincotDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Christine Jade Dilla-ErmitaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Marta BjornsonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Randi A FamulaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Thomas R GordonDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Julia M HarshmanDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Peter M HenryCrop Improvement and Protection Research, USDA-ARS, 1636 E. Alisal Street, CA 93905, USA.
Mitchell J FeldmannDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two decades have passed since the strawberry (

Identifiers

PMID38487295
PMCPMC10939388
OpenAlexW4390548054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.