Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487292›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2024

Different electrolytic treatments for food sanitation and conservation simulating a wash process at the packinghouse.

Carolina Rosai Mendes, Guilherme Dilarri, Renato Nallin Montagnolli, Ederio Dino Bidoia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina Rosai Mendes *Department of General and Applied Biology, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida 24-A 1515, Rio Claro, SP 13506-900 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0008-7372
Guilherme Dilarri *Department of Fisheries Engineering and Biological Sciences, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Rua Coronel Fernandes Martins 270, Laguna, SC 88790-000 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2625-7392
Renato Nallin MontagnolliDepartment of Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Education, Federal University of Sao Carlos (UFSCar), SP-330 Km 174, Araras, SP Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-9631
Ederio Dino BidoiaDepartment of General and Applied Biology, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida 24-A 1515, Rio Claro, SP 13506-900 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-1983
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms are predominantly responsible for food deterioration, necessitating the sanitization and removal of these entities from food surfaces. The packinghouse employs free chlorine in the sanitization process; however, free chlorine's propensity to react with organic matter, forming potentially toxic compounds, has led to its restriction or outright prohibition in several European countries. Therefore, this study aims to assess various washing methods, emulating packinghouse conditions, utilizing diverse forms of electrolyzed water to impede microbial proliferation and significantly enhance the food's shelf life. The subject of investigation was cherry tomatoes. The findings revealed that electrolyzed water containing NaCl exhibited superior efficacy compared to electrolysis with Na Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-023-05882-1.

Indexed as

Cherry tomatoesElectrolyzed waterFree chlorineMicroorganismShelf life

Identifiers

PMID38487292
PMCPMC10933248
OpenAlexW4388229982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.