Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487192›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2024

Rethinking immunization programs through the life course approach.

Evelyn Balsells, Margherita Ghiselli, Carolina Hommes, Beatriz Nascimento Lins de Oliveira, Ana Lucía Rosado-Valenzuela, Enrique Vega

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evelyn BalsellsPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States.
Margherita GhiselliPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States.
Carolina HommesPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States.
Beatriz Nascimento Lins de OliveiraPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States.
Ana Lucía Rosado-ValenzuelaPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States.
Enrique VegaPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States.
World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · US

Funding

ACL HHS U01GH002171CGH CDC HHS U01 GH002171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world continues to undergo a profound demographic shift toward increasing longevity -but quality of life is not improving correspondingly. At the same time, countries are taking stock of the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on national immunization programs. The pandemic exacerbated the declines in vaccination coverage for multiple vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD). To ensure that all persons receive all the vaccines for which they are eligible, it is time to consider how applying a life course approach (LCA) to immunization programs can help reinvigorate and redesign actions for greater vaccine uptake. In this mini review, we present the key concepts and principles of the LCA as applied to national immunization programs. Also, we offer recommendations on how health systems can achieve regional and national goals to ensure all people receive the recommended vaccine doses at every stage of life, thus ensuring the greatest benefits for individuals and societies.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeVaccinesHumansImmunization ProgramsLife Change EventsPandemicsVaccinesIA2030immunizationimmunosenescencelife-coursevaccination

Identifiers

PMID38487192
PMCPMC10937433
OpenAlexW4392290792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.