Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487061›Full record

ArticleCJC open2024

Women-Focused Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery Around the World and Program Enablers to Support Broader Implementation.

Gabriela Lima de Melo Ghisi, Marta Supervia, Karam Turk-Adawi, Alline Beleigoli, Aashish Contractor, Warner M Mampuya, Sherry L Grace

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07550036 (Women Education in CArdiac REhabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07550036 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Women Education in CArdiac REhabilitation (WE CARE): a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Effectiveness, Implementation, Utilization, and Acceptability of Cardiac College for Women Across Canada

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Behavior, HealthArmsCardiac College for Women, Usual Cardiac Rehab Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Gabriela Lima de Melo GhisiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marta SuperviaGregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Karam Turk-AdawiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Alline BeleigoliCaring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, New South Wales, Australia.
Aashish ContractorSir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Warner M MampuyaSherbrooke University Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Sherry L GraceKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University Health Network · CAFlinders University · AUMayo Clinic · USQatar University · QASir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre · INUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women are less likely than men to use cardiac rehabilitation (CR); thus, women-focused (W-F) CR was developed. Implementation of W-F CR globally was investigated, as well as barriers and enablers to its delivery. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a survey was administered to CR programs via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) from May to July, 2023. Potential respondents were identified via the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation's network. Results: A total of 223 responses were received from 52 of 111 countries (46.8% country response rate) in the world that have any CR, across all 6 World Health Organization regions. Thirty-three programs (14.8%) from 30 countries reported offering any W-F programming. Programs commonly did offer elements preferred by women and recommended, namely, the following: patient choice of session time (n = 151; 70.6%); invitations for informal care providers and/or partners to attend sessions (n = 121; 57.1%); CR staff that have expertise in women and heart diseases (n = 112; 53.3%); separate changerooms for women (n = 38; 52.8%); and discussion of CR referral with patients (n = 112; 52.1%). Main barriers to delivery of W-F exercise were physical resources (n = 33; 14.8%), space (n = 30; 13.5%), and staff time (n = 26; 11.7%) and expertise (n = 33; 10.3%). Main barriers to delivery of W-F education were human resources (n = 114; 51.1%), educational resources (n = 26; 11.7%), and expertise in the content (n = 74; 33.2%). Enablers of W-F education delivery were availability of materials, in multiple modalities, as well as educated staff and financial resources. Conclusions: Despite the benefits, W-F CR is not commonly offered globally. Considering the barriers and enablers identified, the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation is developing resources to expand delivery.

Identifiers

PMID38487061
PMCPMC10935990
OpenAlexW4387640720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.