Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38487024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Automated measurement and grading of knee cartilage thickness: a deep learning-based approach.

JaingRong Guo, Pengfei Yan, Yong Qin, MeiNa Liu, Yingkai Ma, JiangQi Li, Ren Wang, Hao Luo, Songcen Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

JaingRong GuoDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Pengfei YanDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yong QinDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
MeiNa LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yingkai MaDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
JiangQi LiDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Ren WangDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Hao LuoDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Songcen LvDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knee cartilage is the most crucial structure in the knee, and the reduction of cartilage thickness is a significant factor in the occurrence and development of osteoarthritis. Measuring cartilage thickness allows for a more accurate assessment of cartilage wear, but this process is relatively time-consuming. Our objectives encompass using various DL methods to segment knee cartilage from MRIs taken with different equipment and parameters, building a DL-based model for measuring and grading knee cartilage, and establishing a standardized database of knee cartilage thickness. Methods: In this retrospective study, we selected a mixed knee MRI dataset consisting of 700 cases from four datasets with varying cartilage thickness. We employed four convolutional neural networks-UNet, UNet++, ResUNet, and TransUNet-to train and segment the mixed dataset, leveraging an extensive array of labeled data for effective supervised learning. Subsequently, we measured and graded the thickness of knee cartilage in 12 regions. Finally, a standard knee cartilage thickness dataset was established using 291 cases with ages ranging from 20 to 45 years and a Kellgren-Lawrence grading of 0. Results: The validation results of network segmentation showed that TransUNet performed the best in the mixed dataset, with an overall dice similarity coefficient of 0.813 and an Intersection over Union of 0.692. The model's mean absolute percentage error for automatic measurement and grading after segmentation was 0.831. The experiment also yielded standard knee cartilage thickness, with an average thickness of 1.98 mm for the femoral cartilage and 2.14 mm for the tibial cartilage. Conclusion: By selecting the best knee cartilage segmentation network, we built a model with a stronger generalization ability to automatically segment, measure, and grade cartilage thickness. This model can assist surgeons in more accurately and efficiently diagnosing changes in patients' cartilage thickness.

Indexed as

cartilage thicknessconvolutional neural networkdeep learningkneeosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID38487024
PMCPMC10939064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.