ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Automated measurement and grading of knee cartilage thickness: a deep learning-based approach.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a radiomics-based diagnostic nomogram for patellofemoral osteoarthritis-using lateral knee X-ray images from a South China population.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Knee Cartilage Segmentation Using a Swin-UNet Conditional Generative Adversarial Network: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Review of CNN-Based Approaches for Preprocessing, Segmentation and Classification of Knee Osteoarthritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-Based Segmentation in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Review of Research Trends.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Deep learning analysis for rheumatologic imaging: current trends, future directions, and the role of human.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2025Review
- Predicting joint space changes in knee osteoarthritis over 6 years: a combined model of TransUNet and XGBoost.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Distribution of interscan measurement error in AI-based 3D MRI analysis of knee cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Cartilage Integrity: A Review of Mechanical and Frictional Properties and Repair Approaches in Osteoarthritis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee cartilage is the most crucial structure in the knee, and the reduction of cartilage thickness is a significant factor in the occurrence and development of osteoarthritis. Measuring cartilage thickness allows for a more accurate assessment of cartilage wear, but this process is relatively time-consuming. Our objectives encompass using various DL methods to segment knee cartilage from MRIs taken with different equipment and parameters, building a DL-based model for measuring and grading knee cartilage, and establishing a standardized database of knee cartilage thickness. Methods: In this retrospective study, we selected a mixed knee MRI dataset consisting of 700 cases from four datasets with varying cartilage thickness. We employed four convolutional neural networks-UNet, UNet++, ResUNet, and TransUNet-to train and segment the mixed dataset, leveraging an extensive array of labeled data for effective supervised learning. Subsequently, we measured and graded the thickness of knee cartilage in 12 regions. Finally, a standard knee cartilage thickness dataset was established using 291 cases with ages ranging from 20 to 45 years and a Kellgren-Lawrence grading of 0. Results: The validation results of network segmentation showed that TransUNet performed the best in the mixed dataset, with an overall dice similarity coefficient of 0.813 and an Intersection over Union of 0.692. The model's mean absolute percentage error for automatic measurement and grading after segmentation was 0.831. The experiment also yielded standard knee cartilage thickness, with an average thickness of 1.98 mm for the femoral cartilage and 2.14 mm for the tibial cartilage. Conclusion: By selecting the best knee cartilage segmentation network, we built a model with a stronger generalization ability to automatically segment, measure, and grade cartilage thickness. This model can assist surgeons in more accurately and efficiently diagnosing changes in patients' cartilage thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.