Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486930›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Implementation of an extracorporeal resuscitation (ECPR) program for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Stockholm, Sweden: Feasibility, safety, and outcome.

Lis Frykler Abazi, Andreas Liliequist, Felix Böhm, Magnus Hedberg, Moa Simonsson, Anders Bäckman, Malin Ax, Frieder Braunschweig, Linda Mellbin, Rickard Linder and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lis Frykler AbaziDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Andreas LiliequistFunction Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Felix BöhmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus HedbergCapio Rapid Response Cars and Perioperative Medicine & Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Moa SimonssonDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders BäckmanDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Malin AxFunction Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Frieder BraunschweigDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linda MellbinDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rickard LinderDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Leif SvenssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Juliane JurgaDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per NordbergDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Mattias RinghDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Sune ForsbergDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Jacob HollenbergDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a novel extra corporeal cardiopulmonary (ECPR) program in the greater Stockholm area with focus on feasibility, safety aspects and clinical outcomes. Methods: Prospective observational study of ECPR program including patients with OHCA from January 2020 to December 2022, fulfilling ECPR criteria: age 18-65 years, initial shockable rhythm or pulseless electrical activity, witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and refractory arrest after three cycles of advance cardiac life support. The predefined time threshold from collapse to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) initiation was set at 60 min. Results: We included 95 patients. Of these, 22/95 (23%) had return of spontaneous circulation before ECMO initiation, 39/95 (41%) were excluded for ECMO and 34/95 (36%) had ECMO initiated out of which 23 patients were admitted alive to the ICU. ECMO-initiation within 60 min was met in 9%. In 6 patients vascular access was complicated, 2 patients had severe bleeding at access site requiring intervention. Survival to discharge among all cases was 25% (24/95). Among patients admitted to ICU on ECMO 39% (9/23) survived to discharge, of these 78% had cerebral performance category scale score 1-2 within 12 months. 8 out of 9 survivors had time from OHCA to ECMO-initiation >60 min. Conclusion: The implementation of an ECPR protocol was feasible without any major, unexpected safety aspects but did not meet the intended target time intervals. Despite this, survival rates were similar to previous studies although most survivors had >60 min to ECMO-initiation.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestECPROHCARefractory

Identifiers

PMID38486930
PMCPMC10937228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.