ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Detecting anomalous proteins using deep representations.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- InterFeat: a pipeline for finding interesting scientific features.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry.Viruses · 2025Article
- Fuzz Testing Molecular Representation Using Deep Variational Anomaly Generation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Network-based anomaly detection algorithm reveals proteins with major roles in human tissues.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many advances in biomedicine can be attributed to identifying unusual proteins and genes. Many of these proteins' unique properties were discovered by manual inspection, which is becoming infeasible at the scale of modern protein datasets. Here, we propose to tackle this challenge using anomaly detection methods that automatically identify unexpected properties. We adopt a state-of-the-art anomaly detection paradigm from computer vision, to highlight unusual proteins. We generate meaningful representations without labeled inputs, using pretrained deep neural network models. We apply these protein language models (pLM) to detect anomalies in function, phylogenetic families, and segmentation tasks. We compute protein anomaly scores to highlight human prion-like proteins, distinguish viral proteins from their host proteome, and mark non-classical ion/metal binding proteins and enzymes. Other tasks concern segmentation of protein sequences into folded and unstructured regions. We provide candidates for rare functionality (e.g. prion proteins). Additionally, we show the anomaly score is useful in 3D folding-related segmentation. Our novel method shows improved performance over strong baselines and has objectively high performance across a variety of tasks. We conclude that the combination of pLM and anomaly detection techniques is a valid method for discovering a range of global and local protein characteristics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.