Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486871›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2024

Case Report: Portable handheld ultrasound facilitates intra-articular injections in articular foot pathologies.

Samir Ghandour, Atta Taseh, Walter Sussman, Daniel Guss, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Ashim Gupta, Gregory Waryasz

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samir GhandourFoot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory (FARIL), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Atta TasehFoot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory (FARIL), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Walter SussmanGood Samaritan Medical Center, Boston Sports & Biologics PC, Wellesley, MA, United States.
Daniel GussFoot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory (FARIL), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Soheil Ashkani-EsfahaniFoot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory (FARIL), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Ashim GuptaSouth Texas Orthopaedic Research Institute (STORI Inc.), Laredo, TX, United States.
Gregory WaryaszFoot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory (FARIL), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USGood Samaritan Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intra-articular injections are commonly used to manage joint pathologies, including osteoarthritis. While conventional ultrasound (US) guidance has generally improved intra-articular injection accuracy, forefoot and midfoot joint interventions are still often performed without imaging guidance. This pilot study aims to evaluate the efficacy of office-based, portable ultrasound (P-US) guided intra-articular injections for forefoot and midfoot joint pain caused by various degenerative pathologies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a series of consecutive patients who underwent P-US guided intra-articular injections following a chief complaint of forefoot or midfoot joint pain. Patients reported their pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre-injection and at 3 months follow-up. The procedure was performed by an experienced foot and ankle surgeon using a linear array transducer for guidance, and a 25-gauge needle was used to inject a combination of 2 cc 1% lidocaine and 12 cc of Kenalog (40 mg/ml). Complications and pain scores were analyzed using a paired Results: We included 16 patients, 31% male and 69% female with a mean age (±SD) of 61.31 (±12.04) years. None of the patients experienced immediate complications following the intervention. The mean pre-injection VAS score was significantly reduced from 5.21 (±2.04) to a mean of 0.50 (±1.32) at 3 months follow-up ( Conclusion: This pilot study suggests P-US-guided intra-articular injections offer a safe and effective method for managing forefoot and midfoot joint pain caused by various arthritic pathologies. Further research is warranted to establish the long-term efficacy and comparative effectiveness of P-US-guided injections in larger patient cohorts as compared to non-image guided injections.

Indexed as

foot and ankleintra-articular injectionsmetatarsophalangeal jointportable ultrasonographysports medicinetarsometatarsal joint

Identifiers

PMID38486871
PMCPMC10937340
OpenAlexW4392292015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.