Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486811›Full record

ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2024

The association between physical availability of cannabis retail outlets and frequent cannabis use and related health harms: a systematic review.

Nathan Cantor, Max Silverman, Adrienne Gaudreault, Brian Hutton, Catherine Brown, Tara Elton-Marshall, Sameer Imtiaz, Lindsey Sikora, Peter Tanuseputro, Daniel T Myran

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan CantorDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, 90 Main St W Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Max SilvermanDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, 90 Main St W Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Adrienne GaudreaultClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Avenue, ON, Canada.
Brian HuttonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Avenue, ON, Canada.
Catherine BrownSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, ON, Canada.
Tara Elton-MarshallSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, ON, Canada.
Sameer ImtiazInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lindsey SikoraUniversity of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Avenue East, ON, Canada.
Peter TanuseputroClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Avenue, ON, Canada.
Daniel T MyranClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Avenue, ON, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of regions have or are considering legalising the sale of cannabis for adult use. Experience from tobacco and alcohol regulation has found that greater access to physical retail stores is positively associated with increased substance use and harm. Whether this association exists for cannabis is unclear. We completed a systematic review examining the association between cannabis retail store access and adverse health outcomes. We identified articles up until July 20, 2023 by searching four databases. We included studies examining the association between measures of cannabis store access and adverse outcomes: frequent or problematic cannabis use, healthcare encounters due to cannabis use (e.g., cannabis-induced psychosis), and healthcare encounters potentially related to cannabis (e.g., self-harm episodes). Results were compared by study design type, retail access measure, and by subgroups including: children, adolescents, young adults, adults, and pregnant individuals. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021281788). The search generated 5750 citations of which we included 32 studies containing 44 unique primary analyses (unique retail measure and outcome pairs). Studies come from 4 countries (United States, Canada, Netherlands and Uruguay). Among the included analyses, there were consistent positive associations between greater cannabis retail access and 1) increased healthcare service use or poison control calls directly due to cannabis (10/12 analyses; 83%) (2) increased cannabis use and cannabis-related hospitalization during pregnancy (4/4; 100%) and 3) frequent cannabis use in adults and young adults (7/11; 64%). There was no consistent positive association between greater cannabis retail and increased frequent cannabis use in adolescents (1/4; 25%), healthcare service use potentially related to cannabis (2/6; 33%) or increased adverse neonatal birth outcomes (2/7; 26.8%). There is a positive association between greater cannabis store access and increases in cannabis harm. In countries with legal cannabis, retail restrictions may reduce use and harm. Funding: Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction (CCSA).

Indexed as

CannabisCommercializationNon-medical cannabis legalisationRecreational cannabis legalisationRetail access

Identifiers

PMID38486811
PMCPMC10937151
OpenAlexW4392556940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.