Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486798›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in toxicology2023

Defining the environmental determinants of dysbiosis at scale with zebrafish.

Thomas J Sharpton, Alexandra Alexiev, Robyn L Tanguay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas J SharptonDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Alexandra AlexievDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Robyn L TanguayDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Oregon State University · US

Funding

MODE OF ACTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICANTST32ES007060 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie DeWitt, Siva Kumar Kolluri · 1985 to 2026
$11.6M
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Facility CoreP30ES030287 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie DeWitt · 2020 to 2026
$9.8M
Impacts of Benzo[a]pyrene on Microbiome Development across Lifespan and Generations and the Behavioral ConsequencesR01ES030226 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHARPTON, THOMAS JEFFERSON · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030287NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030226NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome, critical to maintaining vertebrate homeostasis, is susceptible to a various exposures. In some cases, these exposures induce dysbiosis, wherein the microbiome changes into a state conducive to disease progression. To better prevent, manage, and treat health disorders, we need to define which exposures induce dysbiosis. Contemporary methods face challenges due to the immense diversity of the exposome and the restricted throughput of conventional experimental tools used for dysbiosis evaluation. We propose integrating high-throughput model systems as an augment to traditional techniques for rapid identification of dysbiosis-inducing agents. Although high-throughput screening tools revolutionized areas such as pharmacology and toxicology, their incorporation in gut microbiome research remains limited. One particularly powerful high-throughput model system is the zebrafish, which affords access to scalable

Identifiers

PMID38486798
PMCPMC10938905
OpenAlexW4386802356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.