ArticleHeliyon2024
An Arrhythmia classification approach via deep learning using single-lead ECG without QRS wave detection.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in machine and deep learning for ECG beat classification: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Condition-fusion-and-hiding denoising diffusion model for electrocardiogram lead reconstruction.iScience · 2026Article
- A joint CNN-Bi-LSTM-transformer architecture with SHAP explanations for multi-label arrhythmia detection from 12-lead ECGs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MS-LTCAF: A Multi-Scale Lead-Temporal Co-Attention Framework for ECG Arrhythmia Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Arrhythmia detection with transfer learning architecture integrating the developed optimization algorithm and regularization method.BMC biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- A coordinated adaptive multiscale enhanced spatio-temporal fusion network for multi-lead electrocardiogram arrhythmia detection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arrhythmia, a frequently encountered and life-threatening cardiac disorder, can manifest as a transient or isolated event. Traditional automatic arrhythmia detection methods have predominantly relied on QRS-wave signal detection. Contemporary research has focused on the utilization of wearable devices for continuous monitoring of heart rates and rhythms through single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), which holds the potential to promptly detect arrhythmias. However, in this study, we employed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify distinct arrhythmias without QRS wave detection step. The ECG data utilized in this study were sourced from the publicly accessible PhysioNet databases. Taking into account the impact of the duration of ECG signal on accuracy, this study trained one-dimensional CNN models with 5-s and 10-s segments, respectively, and compared their results. In the results, the CNN model exhibited the capability to differentiate between Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) and various arrhythmias, including Atrial Fibrillation (AFIB), Atrial Flutter (AFL), Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW), Ventricular Fibrillation (VF), Ventricular Tachycardia (VT), Ventricular Flutter (VFL), Mobitz II AV Block (MII), and Sinus Bradycardia (SB). Both 10-s and 5-s ECG segments exhibited comparable results, with an average classification accuracy of 97.31%. It reveals the feasibility of utilizing even shorter 5-s recordings for detecting arrhythmias in everyday scenarios. Detecting arrhythmias with a single lead aligns well with the practicality of wearable devices for daily use, and shorter detection times also align with their clinical utility in emergency situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.