Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486759›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

An Arrhythmia classification approach via deep learning using single-lead ECG without QRS wave detection.

Liong-Rung Liu, Ming-Yuan Huang, Shu-Tien Huang, Lu-Chih Kung, Chao-Hsiung Lee, Wen-Teng Yao, Ming-Feng Tsai, Cheng-Hung Hsu, Yu-Chang Chu, Fei-Hung Hung and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liong-Rung LiuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Yuan HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Tien HuangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lu-Chih KungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Hsiung LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Teng YaoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Feng TsaiGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hung HsuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Chang ChuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Fei-Hung HungHealth Data Analytics and Statistics Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung-Wen ChiuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arrhythmia, a frequently encountered and life-threatening cardiac disorder, can manifest as a transient or isolated event. Traditional automatic arrhythmia detection methods have predominantly relied on QRS-wave signal detection. Contemporary research has focused on the utilization of wearable devices for continuous monitoring of heart rates and rhythms through single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), which holds the potential to promptly detect arrhythmias. However, in this study, we employed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify distinct arrhythmias without QRS wave detection step. The ECG data utilized in this study were sourced from the publicly accessible PhysioNet databases. Taking into account the impact of the duration of ECG signal on accuracy, this study trained one-dimensional CNN models with 5-s and 10-s segments, respectively, and compared their results. In the results, the CNN model exhibited the capability to differentiate between Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) and various arrhythmias, including Atrial Fibrillation (AFIB), Atrial Flutter (AFL), Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW), Ventricular Fibrillation (VF), Ventricular Tachycardia (VT), Ventricular Flutter (VFL), Mobitz II AV Block (MII), and Sinus Bradycardia (SB). Both 10-s and 5-s ECG segments exhibited comparable results, with an average classification accuracy of 97.31%. It reveals the feasibility of utilizing even shorter 5-s recordings for detecting arrhythmias in everyday scenarios. Detecting arrhythmias with a single lead aligns well with the practicality of wearable devices for daily use, and shorter detection times also align with their clinical utility in emergency situations.

Indexed as

ArrhythmiaComputer-aided diagnosis (CAD)Convolution neural network (CNN)Deep learningSingle-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)

Identifiers

PMID38486759
PMCPMC10937691
OpenAlexW4392301494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.