ReviewHeliyon2024
Reliability of MEMS inertial devices in mechanical and thermal environments: A review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency Stability Degradation in Quartz and MEMS Oscillators.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Design, Implementation and Calibration of Analog Gyro-Based Angular Rate Data Acquisition System for High-Spinning Rotation Rate Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Phase-Field Damage Modeling of Electromechanical Fracture in MEMS Piezoelectric Films.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Intelligent Micromachine Perception System for Elevator Fault Diagnosis.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in MEMS Actuators for Microfluidic Applications: Emerging Designs, Multiphysics Modeling, and Performance Optimization.Micromachines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reliability of MEMS inertial devices applied in complex environments involves interdisciplinary fields, such as structural mechanics, material mechanics and multi-physics field coupling. Nowadays, MEMS inertial devices are widely used in the fields of automotive industry, consumer electronics, aerospace and missile guidance, and a variety of reliability issues induced by complex environments arise subsequently. Hence, reliability analysis and design of MEMS inertial devices are becoming increasingly significant. Since the reliability issues of MEMS inertial devices are mainly caused by complex mechanical and thermal environments with intricate failure mechanisms, there are fewer reviews of related research in this field. Therefore, this paper provides an extensive review of the research on the reliability of typical failure modes and mechanisms in MEMS inertial devices under high temperature, temperature cycling, vibration, shock, and multi-physical field coupling environments in the last five to six years. It is found that though multiple studies exist examining the reliability of MEMS inertial devices under single stress, there is a dearth of research conducted under composite stress and a lack of systematic investigation. Through analyzing and summarizing the current research progress in reliability design, it is concluded that multi-physical field coupling simulation, theoretical modeling, composite stress experiments, and special test standards are important directions for future reliability research on MEMS inertial devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.