Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486714›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2024

Introducing the STReaC (Spike Train Response Classification) toolbox.

John E Parker, Asier Aristieta, Aryn Gittis, Jonathan E Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John E ParkerDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-1407-4356
Asier AristietaCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-8754-6828
Aryn GittisCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-3591-5775
Jonathan E RubinDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-1513-1551

Funding

CRCNS: Diverse effects of GABAergic inputs on a basal ganglia output centerR01NS125814 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GITTIS, ARYN HILARY, RUBIN, JONATHAN E. · 2021 to 2023
$957k
Behavioral quantification through active learning and multidimensional physiological monitoringR34DA059509 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI GROVER, PULKIT, KUANG, ZHENG · 2024 to 2025
$663k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA059509NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS125814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This work presents a toolbox that implements methodology for automated classification of diverse neural responses to optogenetic stimulation or other changes in conditions, based on spike train recordings. New Method: The toolbox implements what we call the Spike Train Response Classification algorithm (STReaC), which compares measurements of activity during a baseline period with analogous measurements during a subsequent period to identify various responses that might result from an event such as introduction of a sustained stimulus. The analyzed response types span a variety of patterns involving distinct time courses of increased firing, or excitation, decreased firing, or inhibition, or combinations of these. Excitation (inhibition) is identified from a comparative analysis of the spike density function (interspike interval function) for the baseline period relative to the corresponding function for the response period. Results: The STReaC algorithm as implemented in this toolbox provides a user-friendly, tunable, objective methodology that can detect a variety of neuronal response types and associated subtleties. We demonstrate this with single-unit neural recordings of rodent substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) during optogenetic stimulation of the globus pallidus externa (GPe). Comparison with existing methods: In several examples, we illustrate how the toolbox classifies responses in situations in which traditional methods (spike counting and visual inspection) either fail to detect a response or provide a false positive. Conclusions: The STReaC toolbox provides a simple, efficient approach for classifying spike trains into a variety of response types defined relative to a period of baseline spiking.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGlobus PallidusGlobus PallidusInterspike Interval FunctionOptogeneticsSpike Density FunctionSpike TrainSubstantia Nigra

Identifiers

PMID38486714
PMCPMC10936710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.