Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486686›Full record

ArticleScientific programming2020

Machine Learning for the Preliminary Diagnosis of Dementia.

Fubao Zhu, Xiaonan Li, Haipeng Tang, Zhuo He, Chaoyang Zhang, Guang-Uei Hung, Pai-Yi Chiu, Weihua Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific programming, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Applications of artificial intelligence in dementia research.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fubao ZhuSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan, USA.
Xiaonan LiSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan, USA.
Haipeng TangSchool of Computing Sciences and Computer Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Zhuo HeCollege of Computing, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Chaoyang ZhangSchool of Computing Sciences and Computer Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Guang-Uei HungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Pai-Yi ChiuDepartment of Neurology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Weihua ZhouCollege of Computing, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 17AIREA33700016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The reliable diagnosis remains a challenging issue in the early stages of dementia. We aimed to develop and validate a new method based on machine learning to help the preliminary diagnosis of normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), very mild dementia (VMD), and dementia using an informant-based questionnaire. Methods: We enrolled 5,272 individuals who filled out a 37-item questionnaire. In order to select the most important features, three different techniques of feature selection were tested. Then, the top features combined with six classification algorithms were used to develop the diagnostic models. Results: Information Gain was the most effective among the three feature selection methods. The Naive Bayes algorithm performed the best (accuracy = 0.81, precision = 0.82, recall = 0.81, and Conclusion: The diagnostic model proposed in this paper provides a powerful tool for clinicians to diagnose the early stages of dementia.

Identifiers

PMID38486686
PMCPMC10938949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.