Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486630›Full record

ArticleWearable technologies2021

A novel neck brace to characterize neck mobility impairments following neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients.

Biing-Chwen Chang, Haohan Zhang, Sallie Long, Adetokunbo Obayemi, Scott H Troob, Sunil K Agrawal

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wearable technologies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Novel Single-Loop Mechanism for Neck Rehabilitation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Biing-Chwen ChangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0126-1301
Haohan ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Sallie LongDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Adetokunbo ObayemiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Scott H TroobDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sunil K AgrawalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This article introduces a dynamic neck brace to measure the full range of motion (RoM) of the head-neck. This easy-to-wear brace was used, along with surface electromyography (EMG), to study changes in movement characteristics after neck dissection (ND) in a clinical setting. Methods: The brace was inspired by the head-neck anatomy and was designed based on the head-neck movement of 10 healthy individuals. A 6 degrees-of-freedom open-chain structure was adopted to allow full RoM of the head-neck with respect to the shoulders. The physical model was realized by 3D printed materials and inexpensive sensors. Five subjects, who underwent unilateral selective ND, were assessed preoperative and postoperative using this prototype during the head-neck motions. Concurrent EMG measurements of their sternocleidomastoid, splenius capitis, and trapezius muscles were made. Results: Reduced RoM during lateral bending on both sides of the neck was observed after surgery, with a mean angle change of 8.03° on the dissected side (95% confidence intervals [CI], 3.11-12.94) and 9.29° on the nondissected side (95% CI, 4.88-13.69), where CI denotes the confidence interval. Axial rotation showed a reduction in the RoM by 5.37° (95% CI, 2.34-8.39) on the nondissection side. Neck extension showed a slight increase in the RoM by 3.15° (95% CI, 0.81-5.49) postoperatively. Conclusions: This brace may serve as a simple but useful tool in the clinic to document head-neck RoM changes in patients undergoing ND. Such a characterization may help clinicians evaluate the surgical procedure and guide the recovery of patients.

Indexed as

neck dissectionrange of motion measurementswearable neck brace

Identifiers

PMID38486630
PMCPMC10936248
OpenAlexW3180974836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.