ReviewWearable technologies2021
Occupational exoskeletons: A roadmap toward large-scale adoption. Methodology and challenges of bringing exoskeletons to workplaces.
Review in Wearable technologies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07561112 (The Impact of Back-supporting Exoskeletons for Manual Order Picking in Danish Warehouses - The RELAX Project - Protocol for an 18-month In-field Controlled Intervention Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of Back-supporting Exoskeletons for Manual Order Picking in Danish Warehouses - The RELAX Project - Protocol for an 18-month In-field Controlled Intervention Study
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Occupational Exoskeletons as a Technological Solution for Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators for Sustainable Workplace Integration.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Intention Prediction for Active Upper-Limb Exoskeletons in Industrial Applications: A Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Adaptation to a Whole-Body Powered Exoskeleton: Human-Exoskeleton Coordination During Load-Handling Tasks.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Motor imagery BCI enables more practical and user-friendly exoskeleton control than smartwatch for users with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Acceptance of an upper body exoskeleton for occupational tasks among soldiers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Task complexity in exoskeleton setup and takedown: Procedural steps and usability problems as predictors of deployment performance.PloS one · 2026Article
- From Wearable Sensor Networks to Markerless Motion Capture for Instrumental-Based Biomechanical Risk Assessment in Lifting Activities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Rigid-Flexible Coupled Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Enhancing Load-Bearing Ambulation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects on muscular activity and usability of soft active versus rigid passive back exoskeleton during symmetric lifting tasks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Elbow Exoskeletons: Classification by Structure, Actuation, and Sensing Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Preference-based assistance optimization for lifting and lowering with a soft back exosuit.Science advances · 2025Article
- Human activity recognition algorithms for manual material handling activities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Low Back Exoskeletons in Industry 5.0: From Machines to Perceiving Co-Pilots-A State-of-the-Art Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From the idea to the user: a pragmatic multifaceted approach to testing occupational exoskeletons.Wearable technologies · 2025Article
- Biomechanical analysis of different lifting speeds when using an active exoskeleton.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Mapping the evidence on occupational exoskeleton use for the workforce in healthcare, social care, and industry: A systematic scoping review.Wearable technologies · 2025Review
- Performance characterization of a novel semi-active exoskeleton for overhead work.Wearable technologies · 2025Article
- Biomechanical and physiological effects of passive upper limb exoskeletons in simulated manufacturing tasks.Wearable technologies · 2025Article
- Active back exosuits demonstrate positive usability perceptions that drive intention-to-use in the field among logistic warehouse workers.Applied ergonomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The large-scale adoption of occupational exoskeletons (OEs) will only happen if clear evidence of effectiveness of the devices is available. Performing product-specific field validation studies would allow the stakeholders and decision-makers (e.g., employers, ergonomists, health, and safety departments) to assess OEs' effectiveness in their specific work contexts and with experienced workers, who could further provide useful insights on practical issues related to exoskeleton daily use. This paper reviews present-day scientific methods for assessing the effectiveness of OEs in laboratory and field studies, and presents the vision of the authors on a roadmap that could lead to large-scale adoption of this technology. The analysis of the state-of-the-art shows methodological differences between laboratory and field studies. While the former are more extensively reported in scientific papers, they exhibit limited generalizability of the findings to real-world scenarios. On the contrary, field studies are limited in sample sizes and frequently focused only on subjective metrics. We propose a roadmap to promote large-scale knowledge-based adoption of OEs. It details that the analysis of the costs and benefits of this technology should be communicated to all stakeholders to facilitate informed decision making, so that each stakeholder can develop their specific role regarding this innovation. Large-scale field studies can help identify and monitor the possible side-effects related to exoskeleton use in real work situations, as well as provide a comprehensive scientific knowledge base to support the revision of ergonomics risk-assessment methods, safety standards and regulations, and the definition of guidelines and practices for the selection and use of OEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.