ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2021
Empowering Medical Students to Respond to Discriminatory Comments from Patients: A Just-in-Time Training Method.
Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Physicians in training may experience harassment and discrimination from supervisors, consultants, colleagues, or patients and families. Instances of discrimination towards students may impact students' self-esteem, self-efficacy, and ultimately performance. In this particular time, many institutions are looking to enhance their curriculum regarding bias. More tools are needed to help students feel empowered to respond professionally when they encounter challenging situations. This study was designed to assess the impact of a training intervention in addressing biased patient statements. The training was strategically placed prior to clinical interactions. The authors' intention was to present discriminatory statements by patients as one of the many difficult clinical situations that students are being trained to navigate. The authors developed a clinical rubric for decision-making in flowchart style to mimic the decision trees used in diagnostic or treatment decisions. They then created a workshop to help learners use the flowsheet. The workshop was delivered to third-year medical students as part of "Junior Bootcamp," a day-long session of events to orient students to the clinical experiences of the M3 year. The workshop was delivered in the summer of 2019. Respondents indicated that they were more likely to be able to appropriately respond to discriminatory comments after completing the workshop. They also felt that they were more likely to be able to engage in respectful dialogue with a patient and to debrief with a faculty member. Fewer participants felt that they were likely to use the flowchart. Findings indicate that the workshop was useful to participants. It may be especially useful to educators dealing with the COVID pandemic because it is scalable and easily delivered remotely. Further studies are needed to determine if introducing this topic in the clinical years of medical school leads to improved skill in addressing instances of bias that come from patients and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.