ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2021
Artificial Intelligence: Has Its Time Come for Inclusion in Medical School Education? Maybe…Maybe Not.
Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Readiness to Embrace Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Students in Saudi Arabia: A National Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Readiness, Perceptions, and Educational Needs Among Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- Curriculum Frameworks and Educational Programs in AI for Medical Students, Residents, and Practicing Physicians: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Teaching artificial intelligence as a fundamental toolset of medicine.Cell reports. Medicine · 2022Article
- The Cases for and against Artificial Intelligence in the Medical School Curriculum.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Knowledge, Readiness, and Perception of Medical Students Toward Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to strongly modify or even transform the landscape of medicine. Judicious utilization of AI can further propel progress in medical research, facilitate precision medicine, and optimize clinical workflow-the applications are limitless. Although technology and AI algorithms are evolving rapidly and have important implications for future physicians, there is a dearth of literature available for medical students and their educators to learn about AI. While scientific journals provide information regarding AI, they often are written for and by scientists, engineers, and physicians who are well-versed in technology. Currently, medical students must navigate the technical jargon and decipher AI literature without any foundational exposure. It is difficult for students to understand the implications of AI if they do not have basic knowledge of AI and its current capabilities. A fear about AI is pervasive amongst medical students. There is virtually no literature that provides a fundamental and easily digestible overview of AI for medical students and educators, while also offering suggestions about how to integrate AI into medical school curricula. Our goal is to address the lack of formal AI instruction by presenting an informative primer with curricular suggestions for each medical school year, from a U.S. perspective, tailored to medical students and their educators. We seek to present a balanced approach, as there are pros and cons about incorporating AI in undergraduate medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.