Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486554›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2021

A scoping review of high-fidelity bench models for teaching closed reduction of distal radial fractures.

Julie Craig, Ian Walsh

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julie CraigRoyal Victoria Hospital.
Ian WalshQueen's University Belfast.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended.

introductionSimulation training can be beneficial for developing clinical skills without risks to patients. This review considers the literature on simulation models used for teaching closed reduction (manipulation) procedures for distal radius (wrist) fractures, particularly high-fidelity models, and the evidence supporting the use of such models.

methodsA scoping review of Medline and Embase was performed.

resultsFive articles described low-fidelity models, predominantly focussing on low costs and teaching basic principles. Three articles and two commentary pieces discussing high-fidelity models were identified. DISCUSSION: Attitudes towards a high-fidelity simulator were assessed by Egan

conclusionThe discussed models appear helpful to teach inexperienced participants the basic principles and steps in a procedures but a plateau effect appears to limit the potential benefit to more experienced learners. The constraints of educators' time and financial costs may influence the usage of such models in this type of training.

Indexed as

closed reductiondistal radiusfidelityfracturehigh-fidelitymodelreductionsimulationwrist

Identifiers

PMID38486554
PMCPMC10939654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.