Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486527›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2021

Twelve Tips for Re-imagining Problem-based Learning in Medical Education for the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.

Hoi Yan Corliss Wong, Julie Yun Chen, Kendrick Co Shih

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hoi Yan Corliss WongLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine.
Julie Yun ChenDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care.
Kendrick Co ShihDepartment of Ophthalmology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to an almost overnight adoption of online learning across medical schools worldwide. The initial experience proved jarring and challenging for students and medical educators alike, with neither side familiar with the new tools thrusted upon them. Over time, it became apparent that the adaptations made catalysed a long overdue systemic re-examination of the way medical education has been, and should be, delivered. So far, COVID-19 has served as a strong impetus for education institutes to incorporate commercially available and widely accessible communication platforms, including Zoom, to effectively deliver didactic lectures and interactive tutorials in the digital space. At our institution, the University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine (HKUMed), one such example is the problem-based learning (PBL) tutorial, the format of which has largely remained unchanged since its introduction two decades ago. By closely examining our offline-to-online transition, we have been able to identify certain pitfalls when attempting to translate traditional tutorials to the digital space; key considerations concerning the online facilitator-learner experience, and enhancements for more effective learning. In this article, we present twelve tips rooted in our experience as learners and teachers that should make PBL sessions more fruitful for everyone involved.

Indexed as

COVID-19digital literacye-learningProblem-based learningtechnology

Identifiers

PMID38486527
PMCPMC10939515
OpenAlexW3158713966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.