ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2025
Cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine in patients with chronic coronary disease in The Netherlands.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular Benefit of Colchicine in Relation to Baseline Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the LoDoCo2 Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Current Evidence and Future Directions for Colchicine in the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Colchicine in Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence Structure, Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Translational Positioning Across Cardiovascular Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Colchicine for secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke and atherosclerotic events: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsRecent trials have shown that low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) reduces major cardiovascular events in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine therapy in patients with chronic coronary disease when added to standard background therapy. METHODS AND
resultsThis Markov cohort cost-effectiveness model used estimates of therapy effectiveness, transition probabilities, costs, and quality of life obtained from the Low-Dose Colchicine 2 trial, as well as meta-analyses and public sources. In this trial, low-dose colchicine was added to standard of care and compared with placebo. The main outcomes were cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization, quality-adjusted life year (QALY), the cost per QALY gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), and net monetary benefit. In the model, low-dose colchicine therapy yielded 0.04 additional QALYs compared with standard of care at an incremental cost of €455 from a societal perspective and €729 from a healthcare perspective, resulting in a cost per QALY gained of €12 176/QALY from a societal perspective and €19 499/QALY from a healthcare perspective. Net monetary benefit was €1414 from a societal perspective and €1140 from a healthcare perspective. Low-dose colchicine has a 96 and 94% chance of being cost-effective, from a societal and a healthcare perspective, respectively, when using a willingness to pay of €50 000/QALY. Net monetary benefit would decrease below zero when annual low-dose colchicine costs would exceed an annual cost of €221 per patient.
conclusionAdding low-dose colchicine to standard of care in patients with chronic coronary disease is cost-effective according to commonly accepted thresholds in Europe and Australia and compares favourably in cost-effectiveness to other drugs used in chronic coronary disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.