Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486301›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2024

Government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: good practices and lessons for future preparedness.

Shu Chen, Lei Guo, Yewei Xie, Di Dong, Rana Saber, Mohammed Alluhidan, Adwa Alamri, Abdulrahman Alfaisal, Nahar Alazemi, Yahya M Al-Farsi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shu Chen *Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lei Guo *Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Yewei XieSingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Duke-NUS, Singapore, Singapore.
Di DongWorld Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
Rana SaberGeneral Directorate for National Health Economics and Policy, Saudi Health Council, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlluhidanGeneral Directorate for National Health Economics and Policy, Saudi Health Council, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Adwa AlamriGeneral Directorate for National Health Economics and Policy, Saudi Health Council, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlfaisalGeneral Directorate for National Health Economics and Policy, Saudi Health Council, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nahar AlazemiGeneral Directorate for National Health Economics and Policy, Saudi Health Council, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yahya M Al-FarsiHealth Research Unit, Gulf Health Council, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yazid A Al OhalyHealth Research Unit, Gulf Health Council, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yi ZhangWorld Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
Severin RakicWorld Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
Mariam HamzaWorld Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
Christopher H HerbstWorld Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
Shenglan TangGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China. shenglan.tang@duke.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically threatened the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries which have a large proportion of foreign workers. The governments of GCC countries have proactively implemented a comprehensive set of policy measures, and up to our knowledge, a systematic analysis of qualitative and quantitative evidence on the government response is still lacking. We summarized the GCC countries' government response and quantitatively measured that response using four indexes-the Government Response Index, the Stringency Index, the Vaccine Index, and the Initial Response Index, to analyse their response for future pandemic preparedness. Overall, the government response of all the GCC countries to the COVID-19 pandemic has been comprehensive, stringent, and timely. Notably, the GCC countries have implemented comprehensive vaccine policies. In addition, they have worked actively to protect foreign workers to improve their access to health services and secure their essential living conditions, regardless of their immigrant status. All the GCC countries dynamically adjusted their response to the evolving COVID-19 epidemiological burden and started to relax the stringency of the control policies after the Omicron wave, though the governments had different response magnitudes as measured by the four indexes. These findings have provided several important lessons for future pandemic response and preparedness for countries with similar economic, demographic, and health contexts in (1) prompt actions of containment and closure policies with dynamic adjusting, (2) strengthening health system policies, (3) comprehensive vaccination policies with universal access, (4) equitable and free access to testing, diagnosis, and treatment for all, and (5) strengthening the resilience of health systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesGovernmentHealth PolicyHumansPandemicsVaccinesCOVID-19GCC countriesGovernment responsePandemic preparednessSARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID38486301
PMCPMC10941437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.