Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486296›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2024

Analysis of inappropriate prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors during the perioperative period: an observational study.

Pengpeng Liu, Guangyao Li, Qian Wu, Mei Han, Chao Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postoperative quality of life after minimally invasive repair of giant hiatal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pengpeng LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China.
Guangyao LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qian WuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mei HanEvidence-Based Medicine Center, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China. lauralzhang@163.com.
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence and characteristics of inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to prevent stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) during the perioperative period and its associated factors are rarely reported. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of inappropriate prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) during the perioperative period and identify its associated factors in a tertiary care and academic teaching hospital in China and to provide evidence for regulation authorities and pharmacists to take targeted measures to promote rational drug use.

methodsInpatients who underwent surgical operations and received prophylactic use of PPIs from June 2022 to November 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The appropriateness of perioperative prophylactic use of PPIs was evaluated by clinical pharmacists. Associated factors with inappropriate perioperative prophylactic use of PPIs were analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

resultsFour-hundred seventy-two patients were finally included in this study, of which 131 (27.75%) patients had at least one problem with inappropriate perioperative prophylactic use of PPIs. The three most common problems were drug use without indication (52.0%), inappropriate usage and dosage (34.6%), and inappropriate duration of medication (6.7%). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that oral dosage form of PPIs [OR = 18.301, 95% CI (7.497, 44.671), p < 0.001], discharge medication of PPIs [OR = 11.739, 95% CI (1.289, 106.886), p = 0.029], and junior doctors [OR = 9.167, 95% CI (3.459, 24.299), p < 0.001] were associated with more inappropriate prophylactic use of PPIs. Antithrombotics [OR = 0.313, 95% CI (0.136, 0.721), p = 0.006] and prolonged postoperative hospital stay (longer than 15 days) [OR = 0.262, 95% CI (0.072, 0.951), p = 0.042] were associated with less inappropriate prophylactic use of PPIs.

conclusionsThe inappropriate prophylactic use of PPIs during the perioperative period is common. Regulation authorities and pharmacists should take more targeted measures to promote the rational prophylactic use of PPIs during the perioperative period.

Indexed as

Perioperative periodProphylaxisProton pump inhibitorsStress-related mucosal disease

Identifiers

PMID38486296
PMCPMC10938722
OpenAlexW4392811922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.