Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486262›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Access to child developmental assessment services in culturally and linguistically diverse metropolitan Sydney: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Sibella E Bentley, Pankaj Garg, Ori Gudes, Romy Hurwitz, Sinthu Vivekanandarajah, Lydia Y L So

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sibella E BentleyThe Children's Hospital at Westmead, Corner Hawkesbury Road and Hainsworth Street, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia. Sibella.bentley@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1817-2804
Pankaj GargDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District Health Services Building Level 3, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-2679
Ori GudesSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2102-885X
Romy HurwitzDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District Health Services Building Level 3, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Sinthu VivekanandarajahDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District Health Services Building Level 3, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Lydia Y L SoDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District Health Services Building Level 3, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8291-6001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the increasing prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), data regarding access to child development services have remained limited globally. Long wait times are a major barrier to developmental assessments, impacting on care and outcomes. The aim is to retrospectively analyse the demographic profile and prioritisation of patients seen at a child developmental assessment service (CDAS) in a vulnerable region of Sydney, and explore factors affecting wait times.

methodsData was collated and analysed for 2354 patients from 2018 to 2022. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) were collated from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic data and various statistical methods were used to analyse the relationships and impact of factors likely to affect wait lists.

resultsThe median age was 51 months (IQR41-61) and males comprised 73.7% of the cohort. 64% of children were from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds (CALD) and 47% lived in the most disadvantaged suburbs. The median wait time was 302.5 days (IQR175-379) and 70% of children were seen within 12 months. CALD patients and children over 5-years had shorter wait times. Most children with Global Developmental Delay (GDD) were from the lowest four SEIFA deciles and waited longer for an appointment. 42.6% were seen within the priority allocated time or sooner. Children with ASD and/or severe GDD were prioritised to be seen earlier. Overall, the study could not demonstrate any difference in the wait times according to the prioritisation groups.

conclusionThis study provides insights into the profile, prioritisation processes and wait lists of children seen by CDAS in South Western Sydney with high rates of social vulnerability and presents an argument to discuss benchmarking targets with service providers. It identifies the need to prioritise children living in suburbs with socioeconomic disadvantage and refine prioritisation and data collection processes to improve wait times.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingChild DevelopmentAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesAccessCultural and linguistic diversityDevelopmental assessmentVulnerabilityWait times

Identifiers

PMID38486262
PMCPMC10941404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.