ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Clinical and genetic interpretation of uncertain DMD missense variants: evidence from mRNA and protein studies.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular genetics of dystrophinopathy.Journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Genomic insights into Duchene muscular dystrophy: Analysis of 1250 patients reveals 30% novel genetic patterns and 6 novel variants.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPathogenic missense variants in the dystrophin (DMD) gene are rarely reported in dystrophinopathies. Most DMD missense variants are of uncertain significance and their pathogenicity interpretation remains complicated. We aimed to investigate whether DMD missense variants would cause aberrant splicing and re-interpret their pathogenicity based on mRNA and protein studies.
methodsNine unrelated patients who had an elevated serum creatine kinase level with or without muscle weakness were enrolled. They underwent a detailed clinical, imaging, and pathological assessment. Routine genetic testing and muscle-derived mRNA and protein studies of dystrophin and sarcoglycan genes were performed in them.
resultsThree of the 9 patients presented with a Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) phenotype and the remaining 6 patients had a suspected diagnosis of Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) or sarcoglycanopathy based on their clinical and pathological characteristics. Routine genetic testing detected only 9 predicted DMD missense variants in them, of which 6 were novel and interpreted as uncertain significance. Muscle-derived mRNA studies of sarcoglycan genes didn't reveal any aberrant transcripts in them. Dystrophin mRNA studies confirmed that 3 predicted DMD missense variants (c.2380G > C, c.4977C > G, and c.5444A > G) were in fact splicing and frameshift variants due to aberrant splicing. The 9 DMD variants were re-interpreted as pathogenic or likely pathogenic based on mRNA and protein studies. Therefore, 3 patients with DMD splicing variants and 6 patients with confirmed DMD missense variants were diagnosed with DMD and BMD, respectively.
conclusionOur study highlights the importance of muscle biopsy and aberrant splicing for clinical and genetic interpretation of uncertain DMD missense variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.