ArticleBMC oral health2024
Effect of thermocycling on the mechanical properties of permanent composite-based CAD-CAM restorative materials produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing techniques.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of dimethyl sulfoxide on microtensile bond strength and surface morphology of tribochemically repaired nanohybrid composite: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Influence of printing orientation on the mechanical and surface characteristics of a novel 3D-printed definitive resin-based composite.Odontology · 2026Article
- Influence of surface treatment and cement type on the bond strength of additively manufactured permanent resin materials.Odontology · 2026Article
- The Influence of Ageing and Hydrothermal Fatigue (Thermocycling) on Degradation and Fracture Toughness of Light-Cured and Hybrid Resin-Based Nanocomposites (RBCs).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- The impact of tooth brushing simulation and staining thermocycling on surface roughness and color stability of CAD/CAM laminate veneers ceramic materials: an in-vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of artificial toothbrushing on wear, surface roughness and hardness of additively manufactured and milled resin-based restorative materials: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticle Modification of 3D-Printed Crown Resin: Effects of Concentration on Surface Roughness and Vickers Hardness After Thermocycling.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Article
- Effects of high temperature with pressure post-treatment on the Vickers hardness, color stability, and translucency of 3D-printed denture teeth resin under thermocycling conditions.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparison of physico-mechanical properties of 3D-printed resins used as permanent indirect restoration materials.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Fractographic analysis of 3D printed hybrid ceramic single crowns with different aging and post-curing times: an in-vitro study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flexural Strength and Hardness Analysis of 3D-Printed vs. Milled Resin Composites Indicated for Definitive Crowns.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- The effect of post-processing washing time on the physical and chemical properties of 3D printable resin materials.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Mechanical and optical effects of post-curing time and device type in two 3D-printed resin systems.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Impact of Thermocycling on the Marginal Discrepancy of Zirconia CAD/CAM Generation on Central Incisors: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of Pulpal Base, Restorative Material, and Preparation Type on Marginal and Internal Fit and Fracture Strength of Endocrowns.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a 3D-printed nanohybrid resin composite versus a milled resin composite for flexural strength, wear and color stability.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Impact of Thermal Aging on Marginal Adaptation in Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns with Deep Proximal Box Elevation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Optical properties of repaired additively manufactured resin composites and zirconia and subtractively manufactured ceramics: a comparative study of composite resins.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the study was to determine and compare the biaxial flexural strength (BFS) and Vickers hardness (VHN) of additive and subtractive manufactured permanent composite-based restorative materials, before and after thermal aging.
methodsA total of 200 specimens were prepared; 100 disc-shaped specimens (diameter 13 × 1.2 mm) for the BFS test and 100 square specimens (14 × 14 × 2 mm) for the VHN test. The specimens were made from various materials: two subtractive composite-based blocks (Cerasmart 270 [CS], Vita Enamic [VE]), two additive composite-based resins used for two different vat polymerization methods (digital light processing [DLP]; Saremco Print Crowntec [SC] and stereolithography [SLA]; Formlabs Permanent Crown Resin [FP]), and one feldspathic glass-matrix ceramic block (Vita Mark II [VM]) as the control group. Specimens of each material were divided into two subgroups: thermal cycled or non-thermal cycled (n = 10). BFS and VHN tests were performed on all groups. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05).
resultsThe type of restorative material used for the specimen had a statistically significant influence on both BFS and VHN values. However, thermal cycling did not affect the BFS and VHN values. After thermal cycling, the results of the BFS test were ranked from best to worst as follows: CS, FP, SC, VE, then VM. For the VHN values, the order from best to worst was as follows: VM, VE, CS, FP, then SC.
conclusions3D printed and milled composite groups showed higher BFS than feldspathic ceramics. When the VHN results were examined, it was seen that the 3D resin groups had the lowest VHN values. Furthermore, it was observed that the thermal cycle had no effect on BFS or VHN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.