Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486099›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2024

Immediate angiographic control after intra-arterial nimodipine administration underestimates the vasodilatory effect.

Charlotte Zaeske, David Zopfs, Kai Laukamp, Simon Lennartz, Jonathan Kottlors, Lukas Goertz, Henning Stetefeld, Marion Hof, Nuran Abdullayev, Christoph Kabbasch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte ZaeskeInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. Charlotte.zaeske@rwth-aachen.de.
David ZopfsInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Kai LaukampInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Simon LennartzInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Jonathan KottlorsInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Lukas GoertzInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Henning StetefeldDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marion HofDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nuran AbdullayevInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christoph KabbaschInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Marc SchlamannInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Michael SchönfeldInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-arterial nimodipine administration is a widely used rescue therapy for cerebral vasospasm. Although it is known that its effect sets in with delay, there is little evidence in current literature. Our aim was to prove that the maximal vasodilatory effect is underestimated in direct angiographic controls. We reviewed all cases of intra-arterial nimodipine treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage-related cerebral vasospasm between January 2021 and December 2022. Inclusion criteria were availability of digital subtraction angiography runs before and after nimodipine administration and a delayed run for the most affected vessel at the end of the procedure to decide on further escalation of therapy. We evaluated nimodipine dose, timing of administration and vessel diameters. Delayed runs were performed in 32 cases (19 patients) with a mean delay of 37.6 (± 16.6) min after nimodipine administration and a mean total nimodipine dose of 4.7 (± 1.2) mg. Vessel dilation was more pronounced in delayed vs. immediate controls, with greater changes in spastic vessel segments (n = 31: 113.5 (± 78.5%) vs. 32.2% (± 27.9%), p < 0.0001) vs. non-spastic vessel segments (n = 32: 23.1% (± 13.5%) vs. 13.3% (± 10.7%), p < 0.0001). In conclusion intra-arterially administered nimodipine seems to exert a delayed vasodilatory effect, which should be considered before escalation of therapy.

Indexed as

Subarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialAngiography, Digital SubtractionHumansNimodipineVasodilator AgentsNimodipineVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID38486099
PMCPMC10940303
OpenAlexW4392812074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.