Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486079›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Monitoring and predicting corn grain quality on the transport and post-harvest operations in storage units using sensors and machine learning models.

Dágila Melo Rodrigues, Paulo Carteri Coradi, Larissa Pereira Ribeiro Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo Teodoro, Rosana Dos Santos Moraes, Marisa Menezes Leal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dágila Melo RodriguesLaboratory of Postharvest, Campus Cachoeira do Sul, Federal University of Santa Maria, Highway Taufik Germano, 3013, Passo DAreia, Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, 96506-322, Brazil.
Paulo Carteri CoradiLaboratory of Postharvest, Campus Cachoeira do Sul, Federal University of Santa Maria, Highway Taufik Germano, 3013, Passo DAreia, Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, 96506-322, Brazil. paulocoradi@yahoo.com.br.
Larissa Pereira Ribeiro TeodoroDepartment of Agronomy, Campus de Chapadão do Sul, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Chapadão do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, 79560-000, Brazil.
Paulo Eduardo TeodoroDepartment of Agronomy, Campus de Chapadão do Sul, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Chapadão do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, 79560-000, Brazil.
Rosana Dos Santos MoraesLaboratory of Postharvest, Campus Cachoeira do Sul, Federal University of Santa Maria, Highway Taufik Germano, 3013, Passo DAreia, Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, 96506-322, Brazil.
Marisa Menezes LealLaboratory of Postharvest, Campus Cachoeira do Sul, Federal University of Santa Maria, Highway Taufik Germano, 3013, Passo DAreia, Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, 96506-322, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Code 001Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the intergranular variables of corn grain mass during the transportation, drying, and storage stages it possible to predict and avoid potential grain quality losses. For monitoring the grain mass along the transport, a probe system with temperature, relative humidity, and carbon dioxide sensors was developed to determine the equilibrium moisture content and the respiration of the grain mass. These same variables were monitored during storage. At drying process, the drying air and grain mass temperatures, as well as the relative humidity, were monitored. For the prediction of the physical and physical-chemical quality of the grains, the results obtained from the monitoring were used as input data for the multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, decision tree, and random forest models. A Pearson correlation was applied to verify the relationship between the monitored and predicted variables. From the results obtained, we verified that the intergranular relative humidity altered the equilibrium moisture content of the grains, contributing to the increased respiration and hence dry matter losses along the transport. At this stage, the artificial neural network model was the most indicated to predict the electrical conductivity, apparent specific mass, and germination. The random forest model satisfactorily estimated the dry matter loss. During drying, the air temperature caused volumetric contraction and thermal damage to the grains, increasing the electric conductivity index. Artificial neural network and random forest models were the most suitable for predicting the quality of dry grains. During storage, the environmental conditions altered the moisture contents causing a reduction in the apparent specific mass, germination, and crude protein, crude fiber, and fat contents. Artificial neural network and random forest were the best predictors of moisture content and germination. However, the random forest model was the best predictor of apparent specific mass, electrical conductivity, and starch content of stored grains.

Indexed as

Edible GrainZea maysNeural Networks, ComputerTemperatureArtificial intelligenceGrain qualityLoss reduction and grain conservationPost-harvest technologiesPredictive models

Identifiers

PMID38486079
PMCPMC10940695
OpenAlexW4392796586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.