Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38486008›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Conventional extraction of fucoidan from Irish brown seaweed Fucus vesiculosus followed by ultrasound-assisted depolymerization.

Viruja Ummat, Saravana Periaswamy Sivagnanam, Dilip K Rai, Colm O'Donnell, Gillian E Conway, Shane M Heffernan, Stephen Fitzpatrick, Henry Lyons, James Curtin, Brijesh Kumar Tiwari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Convective Drying of Brown Seaweed (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Ultrasound-assisted HFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Viruja UmmatTeagasc Ashtown Food Research Centre, Teagasc, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland. viruja.ummat@teagasc.ie.
Saravana Periaswamy SivagnanamDepartment of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, Bishopstown, T12P928, Cork, Ireland.
Dilip K RaiTeagasc Ashtown Food Research Centre, Teagasc, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Colm O'DonnellUCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Gillian E ConwayIn Vitro Toxicology Group, Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, SA3 5AU, UK.
Shane M HeffernanApplied Sports Science Technology and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, SA3 5AU, UK.
Stephen FitzpatrickNutramara Ltd., Beechgrove House Strand Street, Tralee, Ireland.
Henry LyonsNutramara Ltd., Beechgrove House Strand Street, Tralee, Ireland.
James CurtinSchool of Food Science and Environmental Health, College of Science and Health, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, D07 ADY7, Ireland.
Brijesh Kumar TiwariTeagasc Ashtown Food Research Centre, Teagasc, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Swansea University · GBTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversity College Dublin · IEMunster Technological University · IETechnological University Dublin · IE

Funding

BiOrbic SFI Bioeconomy Research Centre, funded by Ireland's European Structural and Investment Programmes, Science Foundation Ireland (16/RC/3889) and the European Regional Development Fund. (16/RC/3889)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fucoidan has attracted considerable attention from scientists and pharmaceutical companies due to its antioxidant, anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and health-enhancing properties. However, the extraction of fucoidan from seaweeds often involves the use of harsh chemicals, which necessitates the search for alternative solvents. Additionally, the high viscosity and low cell permeability of high molecular weight (Mw) fucoidan can limit its effectiveness in drug action, while lower Mw fractions exhibit increased biological activity and are also utilized as dietary supplements. The study aimed to (1) extract fucoidan from the seaweed Fucus vesiculosus (FV) using an environmentally friendly solvent and compare it with the most commonly used extraction solvent, hydrochloric acid, and (2) assess the impact of ultrasound-assisted depolymerization on reducing the molecular weight of the fucoidan extracts and examine the cytotoxic effect of different molecular weight fractions. The findings indicated that the green depolymerization solvent, in conjunction with a brief ultrasound treatment, effectively reduced the molecular weight. Moreover, a significant decrease in cell viability was observed in selected samples, indicating potential anticancer properties. As a result, ultrasound was determined to be an effective method for depolymerizing crude fucoidan from Fucus Vesiculosus seaweed.

Indexed as

FucusPolysaccharidesSeaweedAnticoagulantsSolventsAnticoagulantsfucoidanPolysaccharidesSolventsDepolymerizationExtractionFucoidanSeaweedUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38486008
PMCPMC10940655
OpenAlexW4392799145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.