ArticleNature communications2024
Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Value of Reversible Carbon Storage in a Zero-Emissions World.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- IAM-FIRE: A Climate Emulator-Based Framework to Project Wildfire Impacts and Risks for Integrated Assessment Models.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Ozone pollution reduction partially offsets the negative impact of climate change mitigation efforts on global hunger.Nature food · 2026Article
- Behavioral uncertainty in EV charging drives heterogeneous grid load variability under climate goals.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Response of Global Forest Management to Changes in Wood Demand.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Eliminating hunger in a world serious about climate mitigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Role of Forest Carbon Change in Shaping Future Land Use and Land Cover Change.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Labour market evolution is a key determinant of global agroeconomic and environmental futures.Nature food · 2025Article
- A catalogue of land-based adaptation and mitigation solutions to tackle climate change.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Mutual reinforcement of land-based carbon dioxide removal and international emissions trading in deep decarbonization scenarios.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Deployment expectations of multi-gigatonne scale carbon removal could have adverse impacts on Asia's energy-water-land nexus.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Land-based carbon removals, specifically afforestation/reforestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), vary widely in 1.5 °C and 2 °C scenarios generated by integrated assessment models. Because underlying drivers are difficult to assess, we use a well-known integrated assessment model, GCAM, to demonstrate that land-based carbon removals are sensitive to the strength and scope of land-based mitigation policies. We find that while cumulative afforestation/reforestation and BECCS deployment are inversely related, they are both typically part of cost-effective mitigation pathways, with forestry options deployed earlier. While the CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.