Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38485899›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

ConTEXTual Net: A Multimodal Vision-Language Model for Segmentation of Pneumothorax.

Zachary Huemann, Xin Tie, Junjie Hu, Tyler J Bradshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Large Language Models and Large Multimodal Models in Medical Imaging: A Primer for Physicians.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Deep Learning for Longitudinal Gross Tumor Volume Segmentation in MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer.Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation for MR-Guided Applications : First MICCAI Challenge, HNTS-MRG 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 17, 2024, proceedings · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zachary HuemannDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. zhuemann@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1472-243X
Xin TieDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Junjie HuDepartments of Biostatistics and Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Tyler J BradshawDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Funding

Multimodal Learning for Contextually-Aware Longitudinal PET/CT image analysisR01EB033782 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Tyler J Bradshaw · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB033782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiology narrative reports often describe characteristics of a patient's disease, including its location, size, and shape. Motivated by the recent success of multimodal learning, we hypothesized that this descriptive text could guide medical image analysis algorithms. We proposed a novel vision-language model, ConTEXTual Net, for the task of pneumothorax segmentation on chest radiographs. ConTEXTual Net extracts language features from physician-generated free-form radiology reports using a pre-trained language model. We then introduced cross-attention between the language features and the intermediate embeddings of an encoder-decoder convolutional neural network to enable language guidance for image analysis. ConTEXTual Net was trained on the CANDID-PTX dataset consisting of 3196 positive cases of pneumothorax with segmentation annotations from 6 different physicians as well as clinical radiology reports. Using cross-validation, ConTEXTual Net achieved a Dice score of 0.716±0.016, which was similar to the degree of inter-reader variability (0.712±0.044) computed on a subset of the data. It outperformed vision-only models (Swin UNETR: 0.670±0.015, ResNet50 U-Net: 0.677±0.015, GLoRIA: 0.686±0.014, and nnUNet 0.694±0.016) and a competing vision-language model (LAVT: 0.706±0.009). Ablation studies confirmed that it was the text information that led to the performance gains. Additionally, we show that certain augmentation methods degraded ConTEXTual Net's segmentation performance by breaking the image-text concordance. We also evaluated the effects of using different language models and activation functions in the cross-attention module, highlighting the efficacy of our chosen architectural design.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPneumothoraxAlgorithmsHumansNatural Language ProcessingRadiography, ThoracicFusionMultimodalPneumothoraxSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38485899
PMCPMC11300752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.