Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38485844›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024

Prediction of mortality in acute pulmonary embolism in cancer-associated thrombosis (MAUPE-C): derivation and validation of a multivariable model.

Mario Aramberri, Jesús González-Olmedo, Adrián García-Villa, Ane Villanueva, Cristina Castillo Maza, Susana García-Gutiérrez, Carmen Diaz-Pedroche

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism Prognosis Using Nutritional and Inflammatory Indices.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mario AramberriInternal Medicine, Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSID-Onkologikoa, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain. marioaramberri@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-2852
Jesús González-OlmedoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Adrián García-VillaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Virgen del Puerto, Plasencia, Spain.
Ane VillanuevaResearch Unit, Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Spain.
Cristina Castillo MazaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital San Eloy, Barakaldo, Spain.
Susana García-GutiérrezResearch Unit, Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Spain.
Carmen Diaz-PedrocheDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital de Galdakao · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital de Cruces · ESHospital Virgen del Puerto · ESOnkologikoa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal risk stratification of patients with cancer and pulmonary embolism (PE) remains unclear. We constructed a clinical prediction rule (CPR) named 'MAUPE-C' to identify patients with low 30 days mortality. The study retrospectively developed and internally validated a CPR for 30 days mortality in a cohort of patients with cancer and PE (both suspected and unsuspected). Candidate variables were chosen based on the EPIPHANY study, which categorized patients into 3 groups based on symptoms, signs, suspicion and patient setting at PE diagnosis. The performance of 'MAUPE-C' was compared to RIETE and sPESI scores. Univariate analysis confirmed that the presence of symptoms, signs, suspicion and inpatient diagnosis were associated with 30 days mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis led to the exclusion of symptoms as predictive variable. 'MAUPE-C' was developed by assigning weights to risk factors related to the β coefficient, yielding a score range of 0 to 4.5. After receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a cutoff point was established at ≤ 1. Prognostic accuracy was good with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.82), outperforming RIETE and sPESI scores in this cohort (AUC of 0.64 [95% CI 0.57-0.71] and 0.57 [95% CI 0.49-0.65], respectively). Forty-five per cent of patients were classified as low risk and experienced a 2.79% 30 days mortality. MAUPE-C has good prognostic accuracy in identifying patients at low risk of 30 days mortality. This CPR could help physicians select patients for early discharge.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPulmonary EmbolismThrombosisAcute DiseaseHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexCancerClinical prediction rulePrognosisPulmonary embolismThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID38485844
OpenAlexW4392818864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.