Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38485812›Full record

Observational studyHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

Parastomal hernia prevention with an intraperitoneal prophylactic 3D-funnel mesh: review of the technique and middle-term results.

Jesus Badia-Closa, Jaume Comas-Isus, Ana Centeno-Alvarez, Angela Arrayás-Valverde, Helena Subirana-Magdaleno, Laura Sobrerroca-Porras, Jose Maria Mullerat-Prat, Jordi Castellví-Valls

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesus Badia-ClosaColorectal Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Deparment, Hospital Universitari Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain. xus@badia.me.ORCID 0000-0003-1656-1892
Jaume Comas-IsusAbdominal Wall Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Deparment, Hospital Universitari Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Centeno-AlvarezColorectal Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Deparment, Hospital Universitari Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Angela Arrayás-ValverdeGeneral and Digestive Surgery Deparment, Hospital Universitari Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Helena Subirana-MagdalenoAbdominal Wall Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Deparment, Hospital Universitari Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Sobrerroca-PorrasColorectal Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Deparment, Hospital Universitari Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Maria Mullerat-PratColorectal Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Deparment, Hospital Universitari Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi Castellví-VallsColorectal Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Deparment, Hospital Universitari Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParastomal hernia (PH) stands out as a prevalent complication following end colostomies, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Various surgical strategies, predominantly involving prophylactic mesh deployment, have been explored with variable outcomes. This study details our experience and mid-term outcomes utilizing a funnel-shaped mesh.

methodsA single-center, prospective, non-randomized, observational study examined consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery with end colostomy, incorporating a 3D-funnel mesh from January 2019 to December 2021 (PM group). A historical cohort of patients with end colostomy without prophylactic mesh served as the comparison (C group). Postoperative morbidity within 30 days was documented, and clinical examinations and radiological tests were employed for parastomal hernia diagnosis during follow-up.

resultsSeventy-two patients participated, with thirty-four in the PM group and thirty-eight in the C group. The PM group experienced 16 postoperative complications, unrelated to the mesh, while the C group recorded 20 complications (p = 0.672). Median follow-up was 22.06 months for the PM group and 63.18 months for the C group. The PM group exhibited a lower parastomal hernia incidence during follow-up (8.8%) compared to the C group(68.4%) (p < 0.001).

conclusionProphylactic use of a 3D-funnel mesh appears effective in reducing parastomal hernia incidence in the short and mid-term, without an associated increase in postoperative morbidity.

Indexed as

ColostomyIncisional HerniaSurgical MeshAgedFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective Studiescolostomymeshparastomal herniapreventionprophylacticwall surgery

Identifiers

PMID38485812
OpenAlexW4392819141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.