ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
Clinical significance of location of perineural cancer invasion detected on prostate needle core biopsy.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroscience in prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- The Association Between Lymphovascular or Perineural Invasion in Radical Prostatectomy Specimen and Biochemical Recurrence.Cancers · 2024Article
- Determining the clinical significance of pathological findings in prostate cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical impact of site-specific perineural invasion (PNI) in prostate cancer remains poorly understood. We compared radical prostatectomy findings and oncologic outcomes in 434 patients with single-site PNI on systematic sextant biopsy. PNI was present in the right apex (n = 62; 14%), right mid (n = 70; 16%), right base (n = 89; 21%), left apex (n = 64; 15%), left mid (n = 58; 13%), and left base (n = 91; 21%). There were no significant differences in biopsy or prostatectomy findings, when comparing apex vs. mid vs. base PNI. Univariate analysis revealed that apex-localized PNI was associated with a significantly higher risk of progression, compared with base (P = 0.037) or mid/base (P = 0.024) PNI. Multivariable analysis showed that apex-localized PNI was an independent risk factor for progression (hazard ratio 2.049, P = 0.002). Among biopsies demonstrating PNI at one sextant site, apex-localized PNI is independently associated with poorer prognosis, though not worse histopathologic features on prostatectomy, compared with mid or base PNI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.