ArticleScientific reports2024
Prognostic mutation signature would serve as a potential prognostic predictor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Biomarkers for CAR-T Treatment Resistance in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Computational modelling of aggressive B-cell lymphoma.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- Tumor Biology Hides Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The present study aimed to elucidate the prognostic mutation signature (PMS) associated with long-term survival in a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohort. All data including derivation and validation cohorts were retrospectively retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and whole-exome sequencing (WES) data. The Lasso Cox regression analysis was used to construct the PMS based on WES data, and the PMS was determined using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). The predictive performance of eligible PMS was analyzed by time-dependent receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses. After the initial evaluation, a PMS composed of 94 PFS-related genes was constructed. Notably, this constructed PMS accurately predicted the 12-, 36-, and 60-month PFS, with AUC values of 0.982, 0.983, and 0.987, respectively. A higher level of PMS was closely linked to a significantly worse PFS, regardless of the molecular subtype. Further evaluation by forest plot revealed incorporation of international prognostic index or tumor mutational burden into PMS increased the prediction capability for PFS. The drug-gene interaction and pathway exploration revealed the PFS-related genes were associated with DNA damage, TP53, apoptosis, and immune cell functions. In conclusion, this study utilizing a high throughput genetic approach demonstrated that the PMS could serve as a prognostic predictor in DLBCL patients. Furthermore, the identification of the key signaling pathways for disease progression also provides information for further investigation to gain more insight into novel drug-resistant mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.